3DMark05 Benchmark Results

[mustrum]

5969 3dmarks. Twisted Evil

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=937


Will break the 6k next week whne my watercooling kit arrives. (Only CPU but it will be enough for those few points missing)

11th in the list with my 80 bucks CPU. :lol2:

[camelot]

It says ure memory is running at 1170....whats the deal with that O.o? And Core at 351 O.o

running 439 core 1170 memory.

Some XT PEs are getting 7k, but of course with the new "beta" driver. Funny though, 3d03 scores drop when using the same driver according to what ive read. If it was a bug in the card, surely all benches would go up 20%? I call shens on that driver (and no doubt Nvidia is trying to do the same thing sadly) :lame:

[PeterJensen]

Well the new cat driver seems really weird...

[jAkUp]

5,702 :)

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=1310

[mustrum]

running 439 core 1170 memory.

Some XT PEs are getting 7k, but of course with the new "beta" driver. Funny though, 3d03 scores drop when using the same driver according to what ive read. If it was a bug in the card, surely all benches would go up 20%? I call shens on that driver (and no doubt Nvidia is trying to do the same thing sadly) :lame:
It didn't happen yet but rumors say that it will not only be WHQL (wich the forceware isn't) but will also get futuremark aprooved.

[Omega53]

Almost 5600 with a 6800GT :D 66.51 drivers
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=1301

[garikfox]

Nice :)

[|MaguS|]

Wow! What wonders rebooting your machine does!

New Score after reboot! 5229!

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=1575

[VoltFox]

Voltfox, what results do you get (framerate) when res is at 640x480? Try the 66.70 drivers at guru3d too.

Sorry mate, I only have the free version, it doesn't allow me to change any of the settings... except, if you want to share the full version that you might have??? HEHE :) just a joke dude...

[Dr Keyzer]

5323

Now I wonder what the LN2 cooling freaks will achieve with NV4X in SLI... if possible that is.

(dan)

[rellingsen]

With the 66.51 preview approved drivers i am getting 5200 at stock speeds (425/1.15) with driver defaults and 5628 with the card cranked up to 455/1.29.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=1874

I'll have to run some more tests with different configs. I ran this one at 238FSB and the memory at 3,3,3. If I up my FSB any higher I have to drop the memory latency down to 3,4,4 and with 3DMark03 I would get slightly lower scores.

[aAv7]

4,150 w/ 6800 GT @ stock. 66.70 drivers. I tried the 66.51's last night, their slower than 70's in games and I'm too lazy to reinstall them just to do one run of a benchmark and then fall back to the 66.70's again. So i'll stick with this score for now....more than I was expecting...I figured i;d get 3k, so im happy with 4k =) Especially @ stock.

[MurmelTiger]

Average Ultra Score I´d say:

5277


http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=1417 :lame:

[shaker718]

hello everyone
im here at work downloading 3dmark just itching to get home and try it out, but i wanted to ask if anyone has done any comparisons on one machine using the 61.77's versus the newer betas? i've kept the 61.77 just because i like watching me dvd's on me compy and the other drivers i tried would crash the system. thanks

[Danhill]

4280 with 61.77

Specs in my sig.

Man I hope Nvidia comes out with a new driver soon, didn't think that Ati would be ahead, regarding the ps 3,0 support. Damn!!

(xxx)

[aAv7]

4280 with 61.77

Specs in my sig.

Man I hope Nvidia comes out with a new driver soon, didn't think that Ati would be ahead, regarding the ps 3,0 support. Damn!!

(xxx)


I know this test is new and everyone is hyped about it, but dont put too much into a benchmark, man. Go by in-game performance. =) When that starts lacking, then it's time to worry.

[Shocky]

4481 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=2404) ?? Why are non-modded x800 Pros beating a GT@400/1100?? :argh:

[Danhill]

I know this test is new and everyone is hyped about it, but dont put too much into a benchmark, man. Go by in-game performance. =) When that starts lacking, then it's time to worry.

Yes I know that, it's the games that really matter it always is, but I wanted to get scores that are higher than ATI, I just bought the card.

[Vapor Trail]

4427

6800 GT at 400/1000 (66.51 approved drivers)
AMD 3000xp at stock
1 gig ram
nforce 2 mobo

[oozish]

Just scored 5164. My cpu was 4000 and something but I scored less than 4fps in each test! LOL. Can't wait for intel multi processor upgradE!
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=2864

[Lalander]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=3031

[PeterJensen]

New score with my Asus 6800GE (modded to 16pipes with rivatuner beta)

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=2445

Main Test Results
3DMark Score 5047 3DMarks

Game Tests
GT1 - Return To Proxycon 21.0 fps
GT2 - Firefly Forest 14.8 fps
GT3 - Canyon Flight 26.5 fps

[Dr Keyzer]

Looks like someone is really close to beat NVIDIA's "industry record" (7229)
Perhaps we should mail coolbits2 to NV? ;)

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?dm05=2668

[PeterJensen]

Well we all know nvidia will be here soon with some driver increasing the score by a 1000 points :) just to counter ATi :D You can be you life on it.

[NoWayDude]

5341 1st run.
service.futuremark.com/servlet/Index?pageid=/orb/projectdetails&projectType=12
Is it possible to run the P.S 2.0,2.A,2.B intead of P.S 3.0 with the 6800's?I'm curious regarding the scores that way.

System specs on sig
FW 66.51