PDA

View Full Version : Help pls, why my fill-rate multi texturing is slower then single-texturing ?


hk81
03-29-05, 08:21 PM
hi everyone,
i'm totaly newbie, so pls help me.
i own pixelview geforce fx5200 128bit memory run on sempron 2600+.
my system stable and runing without problems.

but, when i ran the 3dmark2001se @ default, i only got 7500 mark, which is slower then other system running in the same spec. i tried to check what is wrong, and found out that Fill-rate Multi-texturing only got 300 mtexel, which is slower then fill-rate single texturing which is 800 mtexel. i tried to reinstall the driver (using driver cleaner pro) using 66.93, 71.84 and 76.41, but the result is still the same.

so, any clue for me ?

thanks.

sempron 2600+
msi kt6v
512 kingston pc3200

SH64
03-29-05, 08:47 PM
Thats normal . AFAIK multi-textuering takes more of the fillrate than single texturing . make sense , dosen't it ?? ;)
& your score sounds normal for your system as 3DMark2001SE dont just focus on the GPU , but rather CPU power .
well 7000 might be lower than what i would expect , but i wouldnet worry anyways .

for more on single & multi-texturing you might try this little benchmark program posted here & see how your results compare :
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=27791\


Display adapter: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

FFP - Single texture - 1352.166260M pixels/sec
FFP - Dual texture - 681.763184M pixels/sec
FFP - Triple texture - 315.009216M pixels/sec
FFP - Quad texture - 219.407974M pixels/sec


theres another fillrate benchmark posted by an nvnews member (forgot his name) also concetrate on this but cant find the thread . i have the program right here , but can't upload it due to file size limit .

aZn_plyR
03-29-05, 09:32 PM
yeha its ur sempron cpu and ur 5200..but more of the sempron giving u a bad score :) if that was the 754 3100+ sempron then it would be alot higher...overclock ur cpu

saturnotaku
03-29-05, 09:46 PM
yeha its your sempron cpu and ur 5200..but more of the sempron giving you a bad score :) if that was the 754 3100+ sempron then it would be alot higher...overclock your cpu

Fixed so you look less like a 10-year-old CS kiddie.

$n][pErMan
03-29-05, 10:04 PM
Fixed so you look less like a 10-year-old CS kiddie.So mean... yet so funny!
:udawg: :lol2:

hk81
03-31-05, 06:54 PM
Thats normal . AFAIK multi-textuering takes more of the fillrate than single texturing . make sense , dosen't it ?? ;)
& your score sounds normal for your system as 3DMark2001SE dont just focus on the GPU , but rather CPU power .
well 7000 might be lower than what i would expect , but i wouldnet worry anyways .


hmmm... but if you see the detail of 3dmark2001/2003 result, the fill-rate (multi-texturing) should be 2x faster then fill rate (single-texturing)
but in my 3dmark2001se result, the single fill rate is 800 mt, but the multi fill rate is only 300 mt