PDA

View Full Version : Difference between newcastle and winchester


vX
06-15-05, 11:38 AM
I have a winchester cpu, been thinking of oc'ing it, is this a decent cpu to oc or are the newcastle's better? I know they run hotter, so I would think the winchester is better for ocing? :confused:

Roliath
06-15-05, 11:58 AM
Yup, winchesters' are better for oc'ing in my opinion.

superklye
06-15-05, 12:32 PM
Venice is the way to go though!

Riptide
06-15-05, 12:35 PM
Yeah venice is the best, unless you count x2. :)

If I had a winchester that overclocked well already I probably wouldn't bother changing it out though.

vX
06-15-05, 12:37 PM
well I hit 2.2ghz stable, I never tried anything higher, (it's 2.0ghz by default) maybe i'll see if I can do 2.25 or 2.3, I just don't want to volt mod.

Roliath
06-15-05, 04:49 PM
well I hit 2.2ghz stable, I never tried anything higher, (it's 2.0ghz by default) maybe i'll see if I can do 2.25 or 2.3, I just don't want to volt mod.
Volt Mod? You mean increase the voltage?

CaptNKILL
06-15-05, 06:52 PM
Wewt... Venice is god :D

*points to sig* :bounce:

ViN86
06-15-05, 08:31 PM
heard the san diego is supposed to be even better, hehe

i love my winny, but all i hear is good things about venice