Ram CL setting quick question

[zwazd]

I have a Kingmax 2.5-4-4-8 t2 overclock to 2.5-3-3-6 t1

I can go a (LITTLE) more, what should I set next? Should it be

2.0 3 3 6 t2
or
2.5 2 2 6 t1
or
2.5 2 2 5 t2

which is faster for games?

Thank you.


ps. BF2 run much greater when you turn your head quickly!

[zwazd]

My god, I never thought my ram can go cl2
right now i'm at cl2-3-3-6
next I'm gonna try cl2-3-2-6 t1

[zoomy942]

i would say that whatever your best timings are with the command rate of 1T, do that

[lytalbayre]

I agree with zoomy. 2-3-2-6 1t sounds good.

You can also try 2-2-2-6 1t...

Either of these two are probably best.

[zwazd]

Thanks. I think I'm stuck with that number. can't go anymore.So I might have to pull some number back to sacrifice for the t1. What would that be.
2-3-4-6 t1 or
2-4-3-6 t1

[jAkUp]

How about 2-3-3-6 1T?

[Kamel]

it depends, if you're on an nforce2 board, actually having a timing of 11 at the end is optimal for performance because of the memory controller.

right now i'm running at 250mhz @ 2.5-6-6-11. it's crap timings, i know -- i'm going to try and work on this.

[Nutty]

it depends, if you're on an nforce2 board, actually having a timing of 11 at the end is optimal for performance because of the memory controller.

I dunno, last time I read that, ppl said it helped synthetic bandwidth tests, but in reality didn't make any difference. Some ppl even said it made things more jerky.

[zwazd]

I tried all the numbers, it didn't' work. so, it leave me with the last 2 number to choose from; which is better?

2.0 3 3 6 t2
or
2.5 3 2 6 t1

Thank you all!
I'm on VIA chipset.

[zoomy942]

T1

[zwazd]

it depends, if you're on an nforce2 board, actually having a timing of 11 at the end is optimal for performance because of the memory controller.

right now i'm running at 250mhz @ 2.5-6-6-11. it's crap timings, i know -- i'm going to try and work on this.

Are you sure? 11 seems too high if you ask anybody.