Redeemed
08-26-05, 03:51 PM
Yeah, I bet it would offer unparralleled performance, but it'd also kill ATI/nVidia. Which would realy, really, suck.
If it's a IP company like VideoLogic then this project will remain a potentially good competitor... on paper.
Behind the Kyro GPUs there was ST (not exactly a small company, owning a good portion of the discrete semiconductor products and cheap custom integrated circuits market) and Guillemont. Despite good acceptance by the market, both investors withdrew only after one generation.
So, unless one big name (ie Intel, AMD) decide to license this technology I don't think we will see anything new in the graphics arena. The only other chance is that a big mobo/card manufacturer eventually decides to make a joint venture with some founrdy to launch its own line of graphics accelerators. But which is in the position and has the resources.
Well, I think ASUS could probably pull it off if they wanted to. But I doubt that they will.
If it's a IP company like VideoLogic then this project will remain a potentially good competitor... on paper.
Behind the Kyro GPUs there was ST (not exactly a small company, owning a good portion of the discrete semiconductor products and cheap custom integrated circuits market) and Guillemont. Despite good acceptance by the market, both investors withdrew only after one generation.
So, unless one big name (ie Intel, AMD) decide to license this technology I don't think we will see anything new in the graphics arena. The only other chance is that a big mobo/card manufacturer eventually decides to make a joint venture with some founrdy to launch its own line of graphics accelerators. But which is in the position and has the resources.
Well, I think ASUS could probably pull it off if they wanted to. But I doubt that they will.