PDA

View Full Version : My 7800 GTX Benchmarks

Pages : [1] 2
RealLifePixelShader
10-18-05, 06:59 PM
Please tell me what you think, are they low or normal?

3DMark 2001 - 14372
3DMark 2003 - 14421
3DMark 2005 - 4484

All done on 1024x768 HQ with No AA AF

Core 490Mhz

Memory 1.26Ghz
Banko
10-18-05, 07:38 PM
Er that is about half of what you should get. There is a problem when 3dmark03 seems to be faster then 01.
SH64
10-19-05, 03:24 AM
Yep something's wrong. check for your settings like V-sync & other stuff.

also theres no 3DMark2004 .. its 2005 :)
RealLifePixelShader
10-19-05, 07:05 AM
Yep something's wrong. check for your settings like V-sync & other stuff.

also theres no 3DMark2004 .. its 2005 :)


Dam dam what the &*^%*&^ is going on

I not using V-sync

What else can I check

whats wrong?

please help
PeterJensen
10-19-05, 08:17 AM
P4 ?
RealLifePixelShader
10-19-05, 01:34 PM
No way man, but why is there any thing I can do?


Besides going for AMD
RealLifePixelShader
10-19-05, 02:02 PM
What to do what to do?
Lfctony
10-19-05, 02:19 PM
Windows Vista? Perhaps the problem lies there.
RealLifePixelShader
10-19-05, 07:47 PM
No I took it off, benchmarks were done on XP 32bit, I must still change that.

Is this normal or is there something wrong with the card?

What can I do to get better perfomance?
RealLifePixelShader
10-19-05, 08:58 PM
I disabled all programs and nonessential services and did another benchmark.

Now I get


Why is there such a big difference?

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/attachment.php?attachmentid=13951&stc=1&d=1129766215
RealLifePixelShader
10-19-05, 10:01 PM
Ok I did some tweaking

I'm using 81.40 driver


Benchmark done at 1024x786 with No AA or AF or V-Sync and High Performance

And Overclocked to as high as it will go.

GPU 499Mhz
Memory 1.4Ghz

Again with all programs and nonessential services disabled

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/attachment.php?attachmentid=13954&stc=1&d=1129770037
OWA
10-20-05, 04:06 AM
Is 490/1.26 stock settings for your GTX? If not, try setting it back to stock and see what you get.
RealLifePixelShader
10-20-05, 07:36 AM
Its Overclocked now to as high as it will go. Now getting 6921

Is that better or is it still slow?


GPU 499Mhz
Memory 1.4Ghz
ken1307
10-20-05, 11:11 AM
Its Overclocked now to as high as it will go. Now getting 6921

Is that better or is it still slow?


GPU 499Mhz
Memory 1.4Ghz


you should get close to 9k with an GTX overclocked
ken1307
10-20-05, 11:11 AM
Its Overclocked now to as high as it will go. Now getting 6921

Is that better or is it still slow?


GPU 499Mhz
Memory 1.4Ghz

double post, I dunno why :(
RealLifePixelShader
10-20-05, 04:41 PM
you should get close to 9k with an GTX overclocked



So how can I improve my score. Besides other hardware.

And is it safe if I run my card at

GPU 499Mhz
Memory 1.4Ghz

the all the time?
howe1972
10-20-05, 10:00 PM
Sorry, man,, that's really low. See my sig.
OWA
10-21-05, 01:20 AM
So how can I improve my score. Besides other hardware.

And is it safe if I run my card at

GPU 499Mhz
Memory 1.4Ghz

the all the time?

Your overclock is high and might actually be making your performance worse.
Try running it at stock settings to see if it helps. I haven't tested that yet with the drivers I'm using at the moment (not sure the driver even matters) but I've had my performance plummet when overclocking a little too far. For example, going from 470 on the core to 475 actually caused my performance to drop considerably (from like 12k in 3DMark05 to around 9K). I'm not sure if it is throttling or what when that happens. So, I suggested using stock settings to see if something similar was happening to you.
jasonlky
11-14-05, 12:47 AM
I had low 3DMArk05 scores.... at about 6500. Most forums suggest that this is due to the puny Intel 3.0ghz limitation.

SO I decided to overclock the hell out of it in hopes of saving my rig. Since I am a noob to overclocking... i had many start and stops... finally managed to get a stable clock at 3.45Ghz.... And the results were very encouraging..

New 3DMark05 score at 7498!!! :eek: Does not touch the 8k++ figures some others are putting up.... but my 7800GTX is not OCed yet... still stock at 430/1200. At least now I feel better about my rig. Game play is slightly better as frame rates have improved.

Next will have to learn up a little bit more about OCing to higher frequencies... next target 3.6Ghz!!
newls1
11-26-05, 08:18 PM
Well, anything new yet? Did you break 8k yet.
aAv7
11-26-05, 08:25 PM
I do alittle more than 8K with my rig, so I would suggest your score is a bit low, unless the cpu's are the difference maker.
RealLifePixelShader
11-26-05, 09:28 PM
No not yet and not soon.

Moved to the UK and had to leave my PC behind. :-(
bail_w
12-05-05, 12:11 PM
WTf? i got 10k on my BFG 7800GTX and you are getting not even 7k? hmmm intel cpu?
Infinity666
12-05-05, 10:41 PM
3dmark is a graphics test not a cpu test while a x2 will score higher not by much with the same card your gtx scores should be no more than 1000 less then a fast 64 or x2
Fathertime36
12-06-05, 03:34 AM
3dmark is a graphics test not a cpu test while a x2 will score higher not by much with the same card your gtx scores should be no more than 1000 less then a fast 64 or x2

Very odd, I just finished scoring 8060 video and 7100 cpu, that is better then what a lot of the dual cores are getting and pretty much smokes any P4, and this is with a lowly $130 single core cpu and a 7800gt.....lol for shame

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1525644