View Full Version : Love that left wing media
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html
The source is here at Michelle's web site. http://michellemalkin.com/
Look how they make her look evil with the eyes.
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/attachment.php?attachmentid=14076&d=1130439143
Ninjaman09
10-27-05, 02:00 PM
Yeah I saw that too...really pathetic. Totally expected as well, which is even worse.
DiscipleDOC
10-27-05, 02:06 PM
Maybe they did it for Halloween? :bleh:
Just kidding. Yea...they will demonize anyone that go up against Hillary (Now, there's a scary woman if I've ever seen one.....).
Tygerwoody
10-27-05, 02:15 PM
LoL thats great :p
It does seem more and more like they are Anti Republican party as opposed to being the Democrat party. Is it that hard to focus on real world issues instead of focusing on mistakes of "the other side". Instead of listing mistakes and pointing out stuff AFTER it happens, they need to stop worrying over spilled milk and focus on the problems at hand. All it does is make the problem take longer to solve.
Zelda_fan
10-27-05, 02:27 PM
USA Today did that? I'm a bit shocked. I know they are liberal and all, but this sort of this is what I'd expect from a tabloid not major publication.
sytaylor
10-27-05, 02:30 PM
If that was the onion I would have giggled. Satire in either direction is cool with me, but when rpesented as real "un-baised" news, thats a joke, and an unfunny one.
Reaper106
10-27-05, 02:35 PM
USA Today did that? I'm a bit shocked. I know they are liberal and all, but this sort of this is what I'd expect from a tabloid not major publication.
I'm not a bit shocked, IMHO most main stream media is about as trustworthy as any Tabloid.
I am however disgusted, count on liberal media to reach new lows on a regular basis. :mad:
Ninjaman09
10-27-05, 02:36 PM
I'm not a bit shocked, IMHO most main stream media is about as trustworthy as any Tabloid.
Well said.
Guys I made a better one.
http://img287.imageshack.us/img287/5131/evilcondi0ok.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Reaper106
10-27-05, 02:40 PM
Well said.
TY my friend.:)
This is getting so out of hand, what the hell is wrong with these people?:mad:
To be fare, there was that fake photo of Kerry with Jane Fonda. Republicans just have better photochopping skillz :)
To be fare, there was that fake photo of Kerry with Jane Fonda. Republicans just have better photochopping skillz ummm since when was that faked?.... never heard it disputed before...
It looks odd compared to the original but why no one think they did it just to brighten up her eyes, though they added to much white?:confused:
Ninjaman09
10-27-05, 02:44 PM
Or how about this one?
http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/9546/superevilcondi0bb.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Or this?
http://img415.imageshack.us/img415/9877/ultraevilcondi5de.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
OK I'll stop now.
Tygerwoody
10-27-05, 02:48 PM
LoL... has anyone done a zoom in on the picture? The picture looks like it was done in MS PAINT! The white in her eyes is grade A regular white. And then the edges of the white of her eyes where color normally gets dim is the same color of her actual whites in the picture. Not only was this altered... but man it was HORRIBLY done.
sytaylor
10-27-05, 02:51 PM
They werent ninja's, like ninja...
Reaper106
10-27-05, 02:54 PM
Or how about this one?
http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/9546/superevilcondi0bb.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Lol, you could probably sell that to USA Today for some $$$;)
Or how about this one?
http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/9546/superevilcondi0bb.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
I can't stop laughing at this pic.
As you guys know I am throwing my full support behing Condi Rice for president.
Reaper106
10-27-05, 03:07 PM
I can't stop laughing at this pic.
As you guys know I am throwing my full support behing Condi Rice for president.
If she runs, Condi has my vote for sure. That being said, to this point she has shown no interest in running for President. Of course that could all very well change, and with the outcry of many conservatives for her to run, it may very well happen. :)
No question in my mind, Condi would be great. She is very focused and does a wonderfull job with any task she is given.
Come to think of it, Peewee could run against hillary and he would get my vote ;)
Rakeesh
10-27-05, 03:11 PM
I could definitely see Condi being president. I don't know whether or not I would vote for her though, I would need to know what her policies are first.
Reaper106
10-27-05, 03:23 PM
I could definitely see Condi being president. I don't know whether or not I would vote for her though, I would need to know what her policies are first.
I don't really know what her policies are, I base my statment on the assumption that Bills nightmare is gonna run for President. I figure a trained monkey would be better than that. IMHO I belive that she "Condi" would make a fine president however. Time shall tell:)
Rakeesh
10-27-05, 04:57 PM
I don't really know what her policies are, I base my statment on the assumption that Bills nightmare is gonna run for President. I figure a trained monkey would be better than that. IMHO I belive that she "Condi" would make a fine president however. Time shall tell:)
Well, it would be unconstitutional for hillary to run for office. She has already served as president for two full terms from 93 to 01.
:D
Reaper106
10-27-05, 08:24 PM
Well, it would be unconstitutional for hillary to run for office. She has already served as president for two full terms from 93 to 01.
:D
LOL, You got that right brother, maybe we can stop her from running on those facts alone :D
Drumphil
10-27-05, 08:36 PM
Editor's note: The photo of Condoleezza Rice that originally accompanied this story was altered in a manner that did not meet USA TODAY's editorial standards. The photo has been replaced by a properly adjusted copy. Photos published online are routinely cropped for size and adjusted for brightness and sharpness to optimize their appearance. In this case, after sharpening the photo for clarity, the editor brightened a portion of Rice's face, giving her eyes an unnatural appearance. This resulted in a distortion of the original not in keeping with our editorial standards.
so do you believe them or not? I mean, has anyone read the article? The edited version looks "evil" and therefore this was a deliberate attack on rice? I think you're gunna have to do better than that.
They whitened her eyeballs to the point that she looks demonic!
Seen any demons recently?
Anyone would think that photo enhancing was a new idea. It just happened to be rice this time, but NO, it must be the grand liberal conspiracy in action again..
Zelda_fan
10-27-05, 08:38 PM
so do you believe them or not? I mean, has anyone read the article?
anyone who has ever used photoshop knows USA Today's explanation is 100% BS. That is such a crappy photoshop job by little brother could of done it, and there is NO WAY any decent editor would not notice something like that.
Reaper106
10-27-05, 08:41 PM
anyone who has ever used photoshop knows USA Today's explanation is 100% BS. That is such a crappy photoshop job by little brother could of done it, and there is NO WAY any decent editor would not notice something like that.
Agreed, 100% BS, they knew what they were doing. Now that they have been called on it, it is time for them to fire up their lame PR machine. :rolleyes:
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.