3DMark06 Benchmark Results

[slaWter]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=235

Score : 4636 with system in below.

Nearly half of your 05 Score (your Sig)^^

[PeterJensen]

yea my CPU is sucking my overall score down :( I have to find a xxx so i can get rid of that damn cpu score :)

[CrazyIvan]

Main Test Results (everything @stock speeds)
3DMark Score 3881 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 1780 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 1740 Marks
CPU Score 930 Marks

[JamesDax]

847 3DMarks
SMS2.0 Score 414
HDR/SMS3.0 Score 0 (only have 128MB card)
CPU Score 698

ok, ok... so i need to upgrade. i can take a hint. :(

i ran the test without rebooting or optimizing my system at all so i'll rerun it in a bit. i don't expect that it'll be much better though.

Nope, tweaking did no good. My system sucks. No worries, upgrade will be complete in the coming weeks.

[toxikneedle]

Here's my score:
http://img65.imageshack.us/img65/4679/3d069dd.jpg

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=578

[Sgt_Pitt]

2392 :(

sm2.0 1138
hdr/sm3.0 1084
cpu 536

ill be damned if im buying 2 vid cards and 2 cpus

[Ihmemies]

Here's my score:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=578

Something really wrong, since I get 4500 with single gtx: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=578

[JamesDax]

Why dosn't 3DMark06 show the overclocked speed of my GPU? I'm running at 500/650 but the test is showing 300/650.

[toxikneedle]

Something really wrong, since I get 4500 with single gtx: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=578
Hmm I dont know, I have SLi enabled, does 3dmark show if it detects 2 cards or not?

[OWA]

Are you using drivers that provide the 3DMark06 profile? I think it was added in 81.98. Edit: If not, just set it to be the same as 3DMark05. At least in 81.98, the profiles are the same.

[technoid]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=235

Score : 4636 with system in below.
The 3DMark06 results says your GTX 512 is running at 501 Mhz, did you change it or does 3DMark06 read it wrong?

[PeterJensen]

The 3DMark06 results says your GTX 512 is running at 501 Mhz, did you change it or does 3DMark06 read it wrong?

3dmark reads it wrong. Im running it default 550/1700

[technoid]

3dmark reads it wrong. Im running it default 550/1700
Thanks. I was planning to buy an eVGA GTX 512 if I could ever find one. But of course now I'd like to hear something about the 7900 first.

[OWA]

My first run, using the 81.98 drivers, cards stock, cpu at 2.7ghz = 8814

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1736

Edit: Some additional comments. It looks really nice but I wish they would have come up with all new game tests. On the first two, if I wasn't paying close attention, I'd think I was running 3DMark05. Anyway, the Canyon one looks really good but I probably like the artic (deep freeze) one the most. Very realistic looking especially looking into the sun. Probably the first time I've seen looking into the sun look pretty realistic. Oh, the CPU test is very painful to watch.

Edit 2: 2nd Run, did all the tests this time = 8823

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2985

[Acid Rain]

Not quite - Radeon X1800 in this case was benchmarked at 594MHz and has 16 pixel/shader pipes and GeForce 7800 in this case was a 550MHz part with 24 pipes, so we have a fillrate/shader-rate of 9504 of the Radeon to go against the 13200 (shader-rate - 16ROPs) of the GeForce 7800.
Radeon's shader-rate is 72% of GeForce's. Short version, it got spanked.:)

Wow, I can't download this thing to save my life. They are getting hammered.

[ew2x4]

1384 on my workstation rig.

Quadro 1400, dual Opteron 246's, 1GB ECC Ram.

Ehhh. Does that seem low, even for a workstation card?

[XP_GUN]

Man im going to get owned so bad its not even funny :(

[Dr Keyzer]

Bombs during system scan for me. Anyone else having problems running
3DMark06 on XP x64?

EDIT: Nevermind, Got it to run after starting a few disabled services in XP.

Score: 2313 (981, 896, 858)

[xwl]

Bombs during system scan for me. Anyone else having problems running
3DMark06 on XP x64?

Looks like you need to connect to Wbem. Wbem! (nana2)

[NoWayDude]

4090

link: http://service.futuremark.com/orb/projectdetails.jsp?projectType=14

Main Test Results
3DMark Score 4090 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 1868 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 1831 Marks
CPU Score 988 Marks

[OWA]

My other system, Cat 5.13, system stock, X1800XT stock = 3689

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2238

Edit: CPU overclocked to 2.52, XT overclocked to 675/780 = 3939

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=4843

[slaWter]

First run, 7998.

http://img58.imageshack.us/img58/5564/3dmark0679984de.th.jpg (http://img58.imageshack.us/my.php?image=3dmark0679984de.jpg)

Can't wait for two G71 - hello 10k ;P

[evilchris]

Remember guys, if ATI is faster, then 06 is the bestest benchmark EVAR! If NV is faster, it's not a valid benchmark and NV is cheating.

That's my SSXeon forecast for today.

[Superfly]

Remember guys, if ATI is faster, then 06 is the bestest benchmark EVAR! If NV is faster, it's not a valid benchmark and NV is cheating.

That's my SSXeon forecast for today.

and a fine forecast that is too Evilchris.

lol

[joshua7]

My other system, Cat 5.13, system stock, X1800XT stock = 3689

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2238

That is low. 7800gts score something like that.