View Full Version : 3DMark06 Benchmark Results
g-a-m-e
03-01-08, 09:54 AM
18.510
Zapablast05
03-03-08, 12:20 AM
I ran this one in XP.
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b215/Zapablast05/12257Marks.jpg
XDanger
03-05-08, 05:43 PM
I ran it last night and got about 12500.
Today I put the vcore up a notch and got 13110
edit:now 13283@3.696ghz
Zapablast05
03-09-08, 07:34 PM
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b215/Zapablast05/16573.jpg
http://i32.tinypic.com/2vsge9c.jpg
15076
http://www.abload.de/img/stststivf.jpg (http://www.abload.de/image.php?img=stststivf.jpg)
E8400 @ 4000 mhz
EVGA 8800 GTS G92 @ 767x1026x1916
4x1 GB Transcend aXeram PC2 9600
WinXP Pro x Sp2
RaidenWoW
03-12-08, 10:05 AM
15076
E8400 @ 4000 mhz
EVGA 8800 GTS G92 @ 767x1026x1916
4x1 GB Transcend aXeram PC2 9600
WinXP Pro x Sp2
WTF.
My cpu score is 3889. My 8800GTS 512 G92 score is as follows:5477, 5546. How did you get your 8800gts score so high?
Zapablast05
03-12-08, 11:55 AM
He has it overclocked.
RaidenWoW
03-12-08, 01:54 PM
He has it overclocked.
I have mine overclocked to 800 (which is max before it ****s out). HE must have it at 900 or something.
ikjadoon
03-12-08, 01:54 PM
He has it overclocked.
But RaidenWoW has a higher overclock, yet has a lower score in SM2 and HDR/SM3.
~Ibrahim~
Libertysyclone
03-12-08, 03:05 PM
I have mine overclocked to 800 (which is max before it ****s out). HE must have it at 900 or something.
G92 vs G80, the G92 GPU is much more efficient.
ikjadoon
03-12-08, 06:07 PM
G92 vs G80, the G92 GPU is much more efficient.
But they both have G92s!!!
~Ibrahim~
Zapablast05
03-12-08, 07:41 PM
He probably OC'd his PCI-E bus.
ikjadoon
03-12-08, 08:10 PM
He probably OC'd his PCI-E bus.
Ohhhh, that is probably it. How dangerous is that, if at all?
~Ibrahim~
Delbert
03-14-08, 03:18 PM
WTF.
My cpu score is 3889. My 8800GTS 512 G92 score is as follows:5477, 5546. How did you get your 8800gts score so high?
Hello RaidenWow
Just for comparison i just ran thru the bench at my 24/7 clocks and got...
Q6600 @ 3200
8800GTS (512) @ 760/1900/2000 ( core/shaders/mem )
.... 15103.
Best is here.... http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=1506921&postcount=900
Zapablast05
03-15-08, 12:02 AM
Ohhhh, that is probably it. How dangerous is that, if at all?
~Ibrahim~
It's not that dangerous. I had my PCI-E bus at 130 (3000MHz) on my 750i.
RoachMojo
03-24-08, 03:12 PM
My Meager score: 16908
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5870804
E30325i 2.7
03-30-08, 08:02 AM
My Score:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v440/BMWE30M/Capture.jpg
http://i30.tinypic.com/kaqtqq.jpg
System see sig. :D
(nana2)
cpu @ 3.0Ghz
card @ stock (660/1674/950)
12050
My score @1920x1200, 8xAA, 16xAF (didn't bother with default because CPU limited):
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5955906
Tested with CPU at 4.05Ghz (450x9) for 'Default' and at 3.6Ghz (450x8) @ 1920x1080. Results in sig.
Tested with CPU at 4.05Ghz (450x9) for 'Default' and at 3.6Ghz (450x8) @ 1920x1080. Results in sig.
What do you get with 8AA and 16AF maxed @1920x?
I tested CPU at 3.6 and 3.8, and the difference is less than 200 points @ my native res with AA and AF maxed. At defualt 3.8 gives nearly a 1K boost to the overall score.
E30325i 2.7
03-31-08, 09:04 AM
1920X1200
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v440/BMWE30M/1920X1200.jpg
What do you get with 8AA and 16AF maxed @1920x?
I tested CPU at 3.6 and 3.8, and the difference is less than 200 points @ my native res with AA and AF maxed. At defualt 3.8 gives nearly a 1K boost to the overall score.
I'm at work ATM. I'll give it a go when I get home. I won't be able to post back until tomorrow as I currently have no internetz at home.
Time to update your sig Mr BMW man :D
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.