gf FX 5800 NON-ultra....can anyone verify this?

[Sazar]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=270840

saw this score posted @ b3d... wondering about it and if the non-ultra has any issues in architecture ? that score seems a touch low

[digitalwanderer]

No, no...that's right. The FX 5800 Non-ultra just kind of sucks. :)

[Sazar]

Originally posted by digitalwanderer
No, no...that's right. The FX 5800 Non-ultra just kind of sucks. :)

lol... well it seems weird that the card is only 100 mhz slower and has half the 3dmark03 score of the ULTRA version...

I say only becaues I am looking in terms of the bigger picture... 400-500 mhz... == 800 - 1000mhz ddr ( II )

it just seems a lot less than what I expected...

for reference.. my STOCK sore on 3dmark03... no oc'ing of anything... unlike the cpu in question for the 5800 non-ultra score...

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=118274

[digitalwanderer]

Your score looks a lot more realistic to me, but I liked my answer better anyways. :bleh:

[Sazar]

Originally posted by digitalwanderer
Your score looks a lot more realistic to me, but I liked my answer better anyways. :bleh:

currently for stock systems @ stock gpu clocks... I have the 3rd highest score for my clocks... :) not bad considering my memory is not exactly the fastest in the world for benchmarking... though supremely adequate for my day to day use (I am not a big benchmarker... )