View Full Version : How much more is needed?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,80676,00.html
vampireuk
03-10-03, 03:13 PM
A six pack of beer, 512mb 3500 Corsair RAM, 3 x 200GB Hard drives and a uber watercooling set up.
Reading this Bush?;) :D
Ok, for 50 cents more we can make that a super sized order. :p
1stFlight
03-10-03, 03:26 PM
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/2020/GMA030310Iraq_weapons_evidence.html
Unfortunately, still a lot more. Okay, the'y've found a lot of things, "capable" of delivering arms, doesn't mean they have chem, or bio weapons.
We need a major find by U.N. inspectors to actually sway, votes and sway public perception.
Hell, and Iraqi drone could be outfitted to spray insecticide over farmland. Not every device has a wartime role.
Besides, it was in Blix's report. If he choose to skip over it. He had a good reason, it's not like he's pro-Iraq or anything.
The absolute lack of morals and logic is depressing me.
Iraq signed a treaty in which they have been in violation since 1992.
The drone was never claimed. A VIOLATION!
The resolution says Iraq must disarm. It is not up to the inspectores to find it. It never was up to the inspectors. How ever it has turned into it because of shfting pricipals like our that allow the deterioration of treaties and resolutions.
The point is why use deplomatic solutions when Saddom will not follow through with them.
26 skermishes and wars have been fought since the UN only 3 times has the UN been approached to vote on a use of force vote.
the three times were.
Korea
bahhh can't remember the 2nd one
Gulf war
Te point is that all three time it was the US that came to the UN.
France is today fighting a war in the Ivory Coast. Did they go to the UN? NO!
It seems to me all UN rules apply only to the US.
I am done with this argument since intellectual honest isn't an option for you point of view.
I'm gonna start posting meaingless stuff like K.I.L.E.R. does :p
Bah, forget it. Let's just wait until Iraq attacks someone and deal with it then. :rolleyes:
It sort of reminds me of a scene in "Demolition Man" in which the nefarious Simon Phoenix is out wreaking havoc, causing many "murder/death/kills" in San Angeles. The chief's plan of catching him? Wait for another "murder/death/kill" to occur, and apprehend him then.
Hmph.
Cheers,
JND
Originally posted by UDawg71
26 skermishes and wars have been fought since the UN only 3 times has the UN been approached to vote on a use of force vote.
the three times were.
Korea
bahhh can't remember the 2nd one
Gulf war
I think it was for the US operation in Afghanistan, wasn't it? I know it was some US operation, 'cause we're the only ones who made a habit of at least trying to work through the lunacy that is the UN.
Cheers,
JND
YA, Afghanistan. I had a brain fart.
StealthHawk
03-10-03, 04:24 PM
Originally posted by UDawg71
The resolution says Iraq must disarm. It is not up to the inspectores to find it. It never was up to the inspectors. How ever it has turned into it because of shfting pricipals like our that allow the deterioration of treaties and resolutions.
now that's just ridiculous.
for the very reason that it is impossible to know when and if Saddam ever disarms. because we don't know what exactly he has.
basically you can only make him disarm inasfar as you can prove that he possesses. in other words, we need inspectors or someone to prove what he has, how much, and where it is stored. only then can we be sure it will be destroyed.
OMG!!! Do you people have any information at all?
He gave the US and the UN a list of what WMD he had after the gulf war. We said alright destroy those and we will look to see if you have done it. HE HAS NOT.
We have seen what total disarmarment looks like when South Africa did it. We had inspectors there to watch. They did not put any stink about it.
Again it is up to Saddom to show us what he has and the inspectors to make sure he does it. It is not up to them to play hide and seek with him.
This is not hard to understand. Lord have mercy my 4 year old even understands this. :banghead:
I know you guys are not this thick skulled so you must just be ignoring the facts.
Go and read the resolutions.
AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
1stFlight
03-10-03, 06:22 PM
Israel is in violation of 43+ resolutions, they'd be in violation of more, but we've vetoed 35 of the others. The UN by nature was designed as a body to protect the peace not wage wars.
Hence why they never gave the UN an army.
Give it time UDawg71, Iraq will hang themselves, and then we'll be justified.
Speaking of justified, since when did we become to world policeman? I recall Bush I saying we weren't .
Originally posted by UDawg71
The absolute lack of morals and logic is depressing me.
Iraq signed a treaty in which they have been in violation since 1992.
The drone was never claimed. A VIOLATION!
The resolution says Iraq must disarm. It is not up to the inspectores to find it. It never was up to the inspectors. How ever it has turned into it because of shfting pricipals like our that allow the deterioration of treaties and resolutions.
The point is why use deplomatic solutions when Saddom will not follow through with them.
26 skermishes and wars have been fought since the UN only 3 times has the UN been approached to vote on a use of force vote.
the three times were.
Korea
bahhh can't remember the 2nd one
Gulf war
Te point is that all three time it was the US that came to the UN.
France is today fighting a war in the Ivory Coast. Did they go to the UN? NO!
It seems to me all UN rules apply only to the US.
I am done with this argument since intellectual honest isn't an option for you point of view.
I'm gonna start posting meaingless stuff like K.I.L.E.R. does :p
StealthHawk
03-10-03, 09:40 PM
Originally posted by UDawg71
OMG!!! Do you people have any information at all?
He gave the US and the UN a list of what WMD he had after the gulf war. We said alright destroy those and we will look to see if you have done it. HE HAS NOT.
i think you can see this next question coming. how do you know it was a comprehensive list?
LORD-eX-Bu
03-11-03, 12:59 AM
Originally posted by 1stFlight
Give it time UDawg71, Iraq will hang themselves, and then we'll be justified.
finally something we can agree on;)
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.