PDA

View Full Version : Quick question amd fx 60 vs core duo


Saintster
01-29-07, 03:39 PM
My question is if i upgrade to a core duo e6600 I believe and new mobo evga 680 or whatever it is and 2 gigs of ram which all in all is about 850 will that be a huge improvement over my current set up or will it marginal, would the money spent be worth it. Thanks

Bman212121
01-29-07, 04:44 PM
My question is if i upgrade to a core duo e6600 I believe and new mobo evga 680 or whatever it is and 2 gigs of ram which all in all is about 850 will that be a huge improvement over my current set up or will it marginal, would the money spent be worth it. Thanks

If you have the $$$ go for it. :) Your proc is probably right on par with a E6600 at stock speeds. So if you don't overclock the Core 2, then you probably won't really notice a differnce. If you do overclock it, you can get up to 50% increase in performance since they can usually overclock very well. That processor runs at 2.4 stock, and I'm sure you'd have no problems getting a 33% increase out of it, aka 3.2GHZ.

Saintster
01-29-07, 04:47 PM
Thanks for the reply. Kinda pricey for that performance gain. Thanks again.

Dazz
01-29-07, 08:57 PM
Well so far i have managed to get mt E4300 1800MHz processor to 3Ghz so got a 1.2GHz out of the CPU :) I know i can get more but my boards voltage is a little flacky i sjould be able to get more if i can get the voltage past 1.4, the next option i can get the voltage is 1.63 so a little too high. need more like 1.55. so a 1.2GHz overclock with an increase of 0.08v that and i have only been playing around with it for a couple of hours there are tonnes of options.

Demon_82
01-30-07, 03:24 PM
The rightest answer is that the difference depends on what you measure. But in nearly every test there is only two results, a techincal draw, or a clear superiority from the E6600, at stock speeds. Check the CPU charts from Toms Hardware (http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html?modelx=33&model1=432&model2=475&chart=161) for example, and you'll find what I say, a few tests favour the AMD FX60, others have nearly the same performance, but where the scores get more distant, always the Core 2 Duo E6600 is the one winning. And it has a vastly superior overclocking margin, so when both are overclocked to the limit, the E6600 has even more superiority.

Bman212121
01-30-07, 07:07 PM
The rightest answer is that the difference depends on what you measure. But in nearly every test there is only two results, a techincal draw, or a clear superiority from the E6600, at stock speeds. Check the CPU charts from Toms Hardware (http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html?modelx=33&model1=432&model2=475&chart=161) for example, and you'll find what I say, a few tests favour the AMD FX60, others have nearly the same performance, but where the scores get more distant, always the Core 2 Duo E6600 is the one winning. And it has a vastly superior overclocking margin, so when both are overclocked to the limit, the E6600 has even more superiority.

The FX-60 @ 3.0 is right about in line with the E6600 at stock speeds. There are some tests where the C2D's will come out ahead it, but overall I think it is comparible. You are correct that stock to stock it is always going to be the E6600, and once you OC the E6600 will be much faster.

Saintster
02-01-07, 11:51 PM
Thanks for the replies. I'll keep my fx 60 for another year and when I build another rig I'll go with what ever is top dog at that time. For now the fx will suffice.

Amuro
02-02-07, 12:21 AM
What video card are you or will be using? The FX-60 is sure going to hold back your video cards if you're going to a 8800 SLI setup.

a12ctic
02-02-07, 12:31 AM
If you have the FX60, dont bother, its not worth that extra 10%

Regaurdless of what people say, there are VERY VERY few games that will hold back your video card while using sli. Mostly those games that dont look especialy good but are made to apeal to a mass audience (Sims 2 comes to mind)

jAkUp
02-02-07, 12:36 AM
Its definetely worth it :) Runs cooler, runs faster, uses less power... go for it.

Amuro
02-02-07, 12:54 AM
How much faster is the FX60 than the X2 4800+? My X2 4800+ held back the single 8800 GTX by quite a lot.

marqmajere
02-02-07, 12:56 AM
Its definetely worth it :) Runs cooler, runs faster, uses less power... go for it.


Yes, but $850 for an improvment you might not even really notice?

jAkUp
02-02-07, 01:20 AM
Yes, but $850 for an improvment you might not even really notice?

Yes!!! :p

marqmajere
02-02-07, 01:46 AM
Yes!!! :p

That's good enough for me! :D

FastRedPonyCar
02-02-07, 10:28 AM
What kinda speed difference do you think I would see if I got an E6600 w/650i board compared to my 3.0ghz P4? :D

Rytr
02-02-07, 12:17 PM
I have a P4 3.4E that I have run on at least half dozen boards with most being able to attain speeds in excess of 3.7GHz stable. Currently running on an Asus P5LD2 Deluxe. This setup is very good for general applications but there is a difference between it and my E6600/P5N-E/Mushkin setup in gaming... Like night and day. :D

FastRedPonyCar
02-02-07, 02:30 PM
hahaha I figured. That's good news as I'm planning a 650i/6600 upgrade within a month if everything goes as planned.