glxgears

[bensa]

So, I'd like to know what framerates you are getting from glxgears.

Little about my system:
Abit KT7A, AMD Thunderbird 1200MHz,
512M SDRAM and a
Gainward GeForce4 Ti 4200 with 128M of memory, and I'm getting around 3600 fps.

Tell me if thats a good framerate.. :(

[Steven301]

On default size 2636 fps, when full screen around 262, Running a P4 1.6@2.13 with 768megs ddr pc2100 Geforce3 non ti 64megs,
Abit SA7.


:)

[bwkaz]

Your framerate is better than mine, so you're not doing too bad. :D

MSI GF4 Ti4200, 128MB, so it's the same chip, just a different mfr.

glxgears gives ~2500 fps. But I think that's because I'm running in 24-bit color mode, at a fairly large res (1280x1024), plus I'm using driver 3123 (4191 does 3D stuff a good bit faster). This is at the default window size.

It could very well be because I'm also running a distributed computing client in the background, so it can't have all the CPU -- it gets ~80% or so. CPU is an Athlon XP 1800.

Note that glxgears doesn't test your video card as much as it tests stuff like CPU, mem bandwidth, pixel fill rate, etc. It's just too simple as far as the 3D features go to test anything too well. ;)

[Abel]

my computer :
- A7N8X Deluxe
- 2x256Mo DDR Corsair PC2700
- MSI Geforce4 Ti4200 64Mo AGP8X
- Atlhon XP 1800+

1600x1200 with 24bit color mode. glxgears gives ~ 6669 fps with kernel compilation in the background.

I use the 4191 from nvidia. :)

[bensa]

Originally posted by Abel
my computer :
- A7N8X Deluxe
- 2x256Mo DDR Corsair PC2700
- MSI Geforce4 Ti4200 64Mo AGP8X
- Atlhon XP 1800+

1600x1200 with 24bit color mode. glxgears gives ~ 6669 fps with kernel compilation in the background.

I use the 4191 from nvidia. :)

Eh, nice? :D

[mi6]

good lord!

geforce2 MX 32mb
Athlon TBird 1.0ghz
Mandrake 9.0

920 at default size :(

time for some new hardware eh?

*edit: I installed the 28xx drivers on Debian Woody, compiled a 2.4.18 kernel and got 1660fps on glxgears!!! Wow, what a difference that made!

[Abel]

I use slackware 8.1 with last driver from nvidia and I take this result with glxgears. It's very strange !!!
I don't know if it's a bug or not because all my friends never see that.

Well, can someone tell me ?

ps: excuse me for my english but i'm french and i don't speak english very well...

:)

[brendan_orr]

P4@2.4GHz,
512Mb RAM
GeForce4 Ti-4200 (128mb) at stock speed.

Niceness at 10: 2904 fps
Niceness at -20: 3124 fps

(just for kicks)Niceness at +19 with pseudo-fullscreen: 290 fps :D

[bensa]

Thanks for everyone. Just wanted to know :)

[how]

Originally posted by mi6
good lord!

geforce2 MX 32mb
Athlon TBird 1.0ghz
Mandrake 9.0

920 at default size :(

time for some new hardware eh?

*edit: I installed the 28xx drivers on Debian Woody, compiled a 2.4.18 kernel and got 1660fps on glxgears!!! Wow, what a difference that made!

how do you get that?

geforce2 mx 64mb
Athlon-xp 1.5ghz
Redhat 8
2.4.19
4191 drivers

350 at default size?
:rw: :banghead:

[daantje]

System:
AMD XP 2000+ (1,67GHz)
512Mb DDR400 (pc3200)
GeForce ti4200 64Mb
Asus A7V8X

Drivers/kernel: 4349 drivers, redhat 2.4.20 kernel


glxgears: 3965 FPS indefault screen.

Not very fast. :mad:

[nileshbansal]

somebody plz tell FPS with Riva TNT 2 card 32 MB as i am getting only 225 FPS in default size.

[tarball]

Hi,

When I run glxgears on my system my frame rate is nowhere near what some of you guys are getting and I don't understand why. Any ideas?? Here is the output from glxgears running at default window size :

{natty} Src/C% glxgears -info
GL_RENDERER = GeForce3/AGP/SSE/3DNOW!
GL_VERSION = 1.4.0 NVIDIA 43.49
GL_VENDOR = NVIDIA Corporation
GL_EXTENSIONS = GL_ARB_depth_texture GL_ARB_imaging GL_ARB_multisample GL_ARB_multitexture GL_ARB_point_parameters GL_ARB_shadow GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp GL_ARB_texture_compression GL_ARB_texture_cube_map GL_ARB_texture_env_add GL_ARB_texture_env_combine GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3 GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat GL_ARB_transpose_matrix GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object GL_ARB_vertex_program GL_ARB_window_pos GL_S3_s3tc GL_EXT_abgr GL_EXT_bgra GL_EXT_blend_color GL_EXT_blend_minmax GL_EXT_blend_subtract GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array GL_EXT_draw_range_elements GL_EXT_fog_coord GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays GL_EXT_packed_pixels GL_EXT_paletted_texture GL_EXT_point_parameters GL_EXT_rescale_normal GL_EXT_secondary_color GL_EXT_separate_specular_color GL_EXT_shadow_funcs GL_EXT_shared_texture_palette GL_EXT_stencil_wrap GL_EXT_texture3D GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc GL_EXT_texture_cube_map GL_EXT_texture_edge_clamp GL_EXT_texture_env_add GL_EXT_texture_env_combine GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3 GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic GL_EXT_texture_lod GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias GL_EXT_texture_object GL_EXT_vertex_array GL_HP_occlusion_test GL_IBM_texture_mirrored_repeat GL_KTX_buffer_region GL_NV_blend_square GL_NV_copy_depth_to_color GL_NV_depth_clamp GL_NV_fence GL_NV_fog_distance GL_NV_light_max_exponent GL_NV_multisample_filter_hint GL_NV_occlusion_query GL_NV_packed_depth_stencil GL_NV_pixel_data_range GL_NV_point_sprite GL_NV_register_combiners GL_NV_register_combiners2 GL_NV_texgen_reflection GL_NV_texture_compression_vtc GL_NV_texture_env_combine4 GL_NV_texture_rectangle GL_NV_texture_shader GL_NV_texture_shader2 GL_NV_vertex_array_range GL_NV_vertex_array_range2 GL_NV_vertex_program GL_NV_vertex_program1_1 GL_NVX_ycrcb GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap GL_SGIS_multitexture GL_SGIS_texture_lod GL_SGIX_depth_texture GL_SGIX_shadow
401 frames in 5.0 seconds = 80.200 FPS
422 frames in 5.0 seconds = 84.400 FPS
421 frames in 5.0 seconds = 84.200 FPS
422 frames in 5.0 seconds = 84.400 FPS

My system is:
Kernel 2.4.19
Athlon XP1800+
1GB PC2700 DDR RAM

Output from xdpyinfo is:

{natty} Src/C% xdpyinfo
name of display: :0.0
version number: 11.0
vendor string: Gentoo Linux (XFree86 4.3.0, revision r1)
vendor release number: 40300000
XFree86 version: 4.3.0
maximum request size: 4194300 bytes
motion buffer size: 256
bitmap unit, bit order, padding: 32, LSBFirst, 32
image byte order: LSBFirst
number of supported pixmap formats: 7
supported pixmap formats:
depth 1, bits_per_pixel 1, scanline_pad 32
depth 4, bits_per_pixel 8, scanline_pad 32
depth 8, bits_per_pixel 8, scanline_pad 32
depth 15, bits_per_pixel 16, scanline_pad 32
depth 16, bits_per_pixel 16, scanline_pad 32
depth 24, bits_per_pixel 32, scanline_pad 32
depth 32, bits_per_pixel 32, scanline_pad 32
keycode range: minimum 8, maximum 255
focus: window 0x2000004, revert to PointerRoot
number of extensions: 31
BIG-REQUESTS
DOUBLE-BUFFER
DPMS
Extended-Visual-Information
FontCache
GLX
LBX
MIT-SCREEN-SAVER
MIT-SHM
MIT-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD
NV-CONTROL
NV-GLX
NVIDIA-GLX
RANDR
RECORD
RENDER
SECURITY
SHAPE
SYNC
TOG-CUP
X-Resource
XC-APPGROUP
XC-MISC
XFree86-Bigfont
XFree86-DGA
XFree86-Misc
XFree86-VidModeExtension
XInputExtension
XKEYBOARD
XTEST
XVideo
default screen number: 0
number of screens: 1

screen #0:
dimensions: 1600x1200 pixels (402x302 millimeters)
resolution: 101x101 dots per inch
depths (7): 24, 1, 4, 8, 15, 16, 32
root window id: 0xaf
depth of root window: 24 planes
number of colormaps: minimum 1, maximum 1
default colormap: 0x20
default number of colormap cells: 256
preallocated pixels: black 0, white 16777215
options: backing-store NO, save-unders NO
largest cursor: 64x64
current input event mask: 0xd84031
KeyPressMask EnterWindowMask LeaveWindowMask
KeymapStateMask SubstructureNotifyMask SubstructureRedirectMask
PropertyChangeMask ColormapChangeMask

[linux gamer]

my glxgears avg fps is 7872.800~8053.000

exeuse my mistaken. it is fooled me that glxgears displayed was side of console caused much frame rates

[nileshbansal]

what graphics card r u using ??

[tarball]

My gfx card is a GeForce Ti 200 (64MB) standard (ie no o/c)

BTW When I run Quake 2 and time map demo1.dm2 with FSAA=Quincunx and VBLANK=0 I get 71fps with 3123 drivers and 77fps with 4349 when running at 1024x768

[linux gamer]

Originally posted by nileshbansal
what graphics card r u using ??

geforce4 Ti 4600 card