View Full Version : What will happen to Saddam?
What will Saddams fate be?
What about running away in the end ?
Hussein: "Is that a MOAB in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?"
vampireuk
03-20-03, 05:04 AM
Bombing or firefight, there is no way in hell a MOAB will be used in baghdad though ;)
"What a month to choose not to pay my life insurance."
-Saddam Hussein
Originally posted by vampireuk
Bombing or firefight, there is no way in hell a MOAB will be used in baghdad though ;)
Especially since the MOAB hasn't gone into production yet. ;)
Also it is designed to take out large military installations and troops not cities.
Bomb. There's no way he's gonna crawl out of his bunker to face the music (unless Delta/SAS manage to get to him)...
Cheers,
JND
t6_shadow
03-20-03, 01:46 PM
Hopefully he will live to face all the charges of war crimes he deserves.
Originally posted by t6_shadow
Hopefully he will live to face all the charges of war crimes he deserves.
ASCI Blue
03-20-03, 07:46 PM
Run to another country under an assumed identity train up his son a bit more and retake Iraq.
fastguy94416
03-20-03, 08:26 PM
just curious, but retake iraq with what? and How would he keep it?
ASCI Blue
03-20-03, 11:47 PM
Originally posted by fastguy94416
just curious, but retake iraq with what? and How would he keep it?
Religious zealots, and other US hating people. It was the people who lived in the US that didn't want to be under the British that removed them and that was over 200 years ago with non-automatic weapons, and boats that took a couple weeks to get from the UK to the US, nevermind the poor (compared to now) communications. Now with internet, encryption, faster transport, and various terror cells over the world it's much easier.
Keeping it just might be a problem unless he were to mass a large enough force to do so. This is one of the few times I will ever say bigger is better. However if we were to cram a democracy down Iraq's throat or if they wanted one in place a few assassinations *could* remove that stability factor too. Since I don't know the population of Iraq I can't say how much easier it would be to do this there rather than in the US, here if Bush were to get axed Cheney would take over. If he went there are iirc 3 or so other people who could do the job before things got really nasty.
t6_shadow
03-21-03, 01:29 AM
"Religious zealots, and other US hating people. It was the people who lived in the US that didn't want to be under the British that removed them and that was over 200 years ago with non-automatic weapons, and boats that took a couple weeks to get from the UK to the US, nevermind the poor (compared to now) communications. Now with internet, encryption, faster transport, and various terror cells over the world it's much easier.
Keeping it just might be a problem unless he were to mass a large enough force to do so. This is one of the few times I will ever say bigger is better. However if we were to cram a democracy down Iraq's throat or if they wanted one in place a few assassinations *could* remove that stability factor too. Since I don't know the population of Iraq I can't say how much easier it would be to do this there rather than in the US, here if Bush were to get axed Cheney would take over. If he went there are iirc 3 or so other people who could do the job before things got really nasty."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAaHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAH thats almost funny I hope you are not serious.
They would never be able to take back iraq. Yeah freedom fighter of those days used that technology but the opposing side had the exact same equipment. Jeez that is not the case here. God think before you speak.
StealthHawk
03-21-03, 06:05 AM
Originally posted by ASCI Blue
Religious zealots, and other US hating people. It was the people who lived in the US that didn't want to be under the British that removed them and that was over 200 years ago with non-automatic weapons, and boats that took a couple weeks to get from the UK to the US, nevermind the poor (compared to now) communications. Now with internet, encryption, faster transport, and various terror cells over the world it's much easier.
you realize that Britain let the US go because they had the proverbial bigger fish to fry in Europe and figured they could always come back later, right?
the US would lose so much face if Saddam returned to retake the country, there's no way they'd let that happen.
the US revolution and its results were a fluke. hence why no other revolution has turned out so favorably.
Originally posted by jnd3
Bomb. There's no way he's gonna crawl out of his bunker to face the music (unless Delta/SAS manage to get to him)...
Cheers,
JND :thumbsup:
LORD-eX-Bu
03-21-03, 11:40 AM
I couldn't care less how this bastard meets his maker. Bomb him, shoot him, cut him up, strangle him, burn him, drown him, smash him:mad:
vampireuk
03-21-03, 01:23 PM
Hand him over to kiler?:D
Originally posted by vampireuk
Hand him over to kiler?:D
If you want Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch knocking on your door, sure... ;) :p
Originally posted by vampireuk
Hand him over to kiler?:D
May God have mercy on his soul. LOL That is worse than sending him to Detroit. :D :p
WTF??? Where did my post go?????
:mad:
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.