PDA

View Full Version : 8800ULTRA first test


Pages : [1] 2

Mojoe
04-30-07, 01:52 PM
First test of the 8800Ultra.:)

Let R600 to death! The most powerful in the world 8800ULTRA first test

http://fabu.beareyes.com.cn/2/lib/200705/02/20070502011.htm

AthlonXP1800
04-30-07, 02:11 PM
All I see is 8800 Ultra pics but no benchmarks tests.

Xion X2
04-30-07, 02:14 PM
Is there a way to translate that page into English? Some kind of language pack that I don't have, maybe?

Mojoe
04-30-07, 02:17 PM
They are there, but the site is slow.

http://fabu.beareyes.com.cn/2/lib/200705/02/20070502011_6.htm


http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Ffabu.beareyes.com.cn%2F2% 2Flib%2F200705%2F02%2F20070502011.htm&langpair=zh%7Cen&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=%2Flanguage_tools

nekrosoft13
04-30-07, 02:19 PM
All I see is 8800 Ultra pics but no benchmarks tests.

there is more then one page

|MaguS|
04-30-07, 02:21 PM
mmmmm sexy.... who wants to buy my other GTX? ^_^

Monolyth
04-30-07, 02:35 PM
I love how they keep changing the value range on the graphs to make them look bigger. How about keeping the same range so the graph display actually shows the proper increase/decrease.

Looking at the 3DMark 06 SLI it would appear that 2 SLI Ultra's are amazing, but look again, it's a 500 point difference, and overall only a 1000 point increase over the GTX series. I'm not impressed by these numbers, I think GTX was such a huge jump that trying to follow with a refresh is not going to provide a huge benefit over the original generation. If these are accurate I think I will be waiting for the G90 before I consider upgrading my gfx.

slaWter
04-30-07, 02:46 PM
Well slow CPU and only 1280x1024, pretty useless benchmarks imo.

But I won't upgrade until G90 anyway.

kevJ420
04-30-07, 02:52 PM
I think the 8800GTX is fast enough, just me though, apparently.

I'll be getting the G90, but only for better IQ.

However, the biggest jump w/ the 8800 gtx will be w/ GS performance and dx10 games that use it. It'll have more speed when there's a huge ass polygonal model that busts to a million pieces (particles.)

The geometry shader part of the stream processors is clocked high as ****.

newparad1gm
04-30-07, 03:07 PM
Is the E6400 really that much more bottlenecked compared to the E6600? Looking at those benchmarks, my GTS OC'ed to GTX clock speeds even beats out their Ultra (which is OC'ed a little as well at (650/2260) from the listed defaults at (612/2160)) in the 3dmark06 test. There is something seriously wrong with their SLI numbers too, as their 8800 Ultra in SLI can't even beat their single GTX in the previous benchmarks except in 3dmark03, and is not much better than their single Ultra in the same benchmarks.

I call this review bollocks.

Xion X2
04-30-07, 03:23 PM
Why is it that every new review for hardware appears to be conducted by retards?

methimpikehoses
04-30-07, 03:34 PM
Who would have thought those two would get together?

:nanahump:

http://fabu.beareyes.com.cn/2/lib/200705/02/011/DSC_8685-01a.jpg

http://fabu.beareyes.com.cn/2/lib/200705/02/011/DSC_8686-01a.jpg

radekhulan
04-30-07, 03:40 PM
8800ULTRA is just overclocked 8800GTX, I see no reason why NVIDIA bothers with this. They will just scare people with horrible price tag.

TiKiMaN1
04-30-07, 03:52 PM
:drooling: I must say that is a beautiful card although that hairy dog can go and an EVGA logo can be put on.:D

TiKiMaN1
04-30-07, 03:58 PM
http://imageigloo.com/images/7449Ultra.JPG

:wonder:

I wonder what the EVGA version looks like.:D

TiKiMaN1
04-30-07, 04:04 PM
http://imageigloo.com/images/901ultraspecs.JPG

Maybe there is an OC version coming out because the core on my cards is faster than that.:p

SlieTheSecond
04-30-07, 04:37 PM
Hmm I get 9400 with 06 with my GTS at stock...

Ultra sounds like a waste of money.

Shocky
04-30-07, 05:17 PM
Hmm I get 9400 with 06 with my GTS at stock...

Ultra sounds like a waste of money.

Put your E6400 at stock and tell us what you get because thats what the benchs are using.

jAkUp
04-30-07, 06:18 PM
Hmm I get 9400 with 06 with my GTS at stock...

Ultra sounds like a waste of money.

Look how high your CPU clock is, the CPU clock makes a huge difference in 3DM06.

stncttr908
04-30-07, 06:55 PM
I hate graphs like that. At first glance there's an appreciable difference, but then you realize the scale is so small.

NoWayDude
04-30-07, 07:09 PM
I will never understand why people release this cards that have only a minor OC
in comparison with the original GTX

Unless, of course, there are changes in the architecture of the card that we are not aware of.
But this seems unlikely, so, waste of time really
Only if they want to put this card at the GTX current price range

weeds
04-30-07, 07:26 PM
Anyone have a GTX that will clock like this on air?

http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/8426/0yyzmogh2dzxmemymdkuuv6.jpg

Banko
04-30-07, 07:35 PM
Anyone have a GTX that will clock like this on air?

http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/8426/0yyzmogh2dzxmemymdkuuv6.jpg
:afraid:

Redeemed
04-30-07, 07:57 PM
So... maybe the Ultra will be a sweet overclocker then? That oc's Ultra actually scored quite nicely. Though not nice enough to warant a $999 price tag.

Uberpwnage
04-30-07, 08:08 PM
OMG, if most of the Ultras can clock that high I may be forced to get one...

The prices will probably drop, I can't see it staying at $999