PDA

View Full Version : Colin McRae: Dirt demo HD benchmarks

gdphk
05-28-07, 04:09 AM
http://we.pcinlife.com/thread-772385-1-1.html

http://bbs.expreview.com/attachments/month_0705/20070526_0858a1af8ec02e3192c5lX6EVdQdYORD.jpg

http://photo.eastgame.net/cloud/dirt/02.jpg

http://photo.eastgame.net/cloud/dirt/05.jpg

http://bbs.expreview.com/attachments/month_0705/20070529_e778d5c8cc958339a7f2auLYjbTURWjV.jpg

http://image2.sina.com.cn/sms/sinapic/27124291-index.gif Who is the boss?
Trademark
05-28-07, 04:50 AM
Just wait untill redeemed see this, I'm sure he has something to prove this benchmarks are fake lmao.

Someone will always blame it on the driver... I blame it on the card ;)

Too bad it's just one game and no GTS
AthlonXP1800
05-28-07, 08:04 AM
No it not fake benchmarks because I ran with these same Ultra settings at 1920x1080 4xAA 16xAF on my LCDTV. On buggy track, I get 15-20fps and on 2 other tracks I get good 25-30fps on Athlon 64 X2 4400+. :)
Trademark
05-28-07, 08:25 AM
I know it's not fake, but Redeemed seems to love AMD, so it wouldn't suprise me if he came in here and declared them to be fake.

(nana2)
slaWter
05-28-07, 11:29 AM
I'm sure it's a driver problem but that looks really bad for ATI.
Toss3
05-28-07, 01:21 PM
http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33891905

Doesn't seem to run too badly on the r600, but then again he's running it at a lower res.
sammy sung
05-28-07, 01:35 PM
http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33891905

Doesn't seem to run too badly on the r600, but then again he's running it at a lower res.

And with Kentsfield QX6700 @ 3.33Ghz
Lfctony
05-28-07, 02:23 PM
NM...
nekrosoft13
05-28-07, 02:45 PM
8(ati) compared to 26(nvidia)

just wow, ati, just wow

nothing more to say
Toss3
05-28-07, 03:42 PM
And with Kentsfield QX6700 @ 3.33Ghz
Well yeah, but shouldn't the game be gpu limited rather than cpu limited? So running it on a quad core shouldn't result in such a dramatic increase in fps. Lastly I think one shouldn't believe some benchmarks posted off of a site written in chinese/japanese. We don't know anything about it other than the scores, so it should be taken with a pinch of salt.
sammy sung
05-28-07, 03:56 PM
Well yeah, but shouldn't the game be gpu limited rather than cpu limited? So running it on a quad core shouldn't result in such a dramatic increase in fps. Lastly I think one shouldn't believe some benchmarks posted off of a site written in chinese/japanese. We don't know anything about it other than the scores, so it should be taken with a pinch of salt.

Sure,i just meant that the comparison between this and the user wasnt a easy one to make as the res differed as you said plus that a different cpu was used.
fivefeet8
05-28-07, 09:38 PM
Those comparison shots are interesting in that chinese thread. It seems the x2900xt is applying AF even though they list it as only 4xAA.
Razor1
05-28-07, 10:23 PM
http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33891905

Doesn't seem to run too badly on the r600, but then again he's running it at a lower res.


Lower res and lower settings (default settings) the benchmarks from pcnlife use ultra settings.
Blacklash
05-29-07, 01:34 PM
I added some results @ Rage. The first set are default install quality and the second are everything set to max value or on. They are both 1680x 4xAA.

http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33892089

I found it to play smooth at either setting and didn't consider the FPS hit worth it to go all max, particularly because I didn't see real IQ returns for it.
Xion X2
05-30-07, 11:08 PM
These results are a long way off from what this guy is getting on his 2900:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2211558&postcount=185

1680x1050 - MAX Game settings - multisampling 4x - motion blur On

http://aycu22.webshots.com/image/16301/2000454252268595101_rs.jpg
http://aycu20.webshots.com/image/14779/2004276884209068831_rs.jpg

9 fps? I call BS. Sure it's at a higher res, but going up one size in resolution shouldn't make your FPS plummet by 300+%.
MUYA
05-30-07, 11:12 PM
Take any results with a pinch of salts, so many variables from in game settings, to drivers settings to mobo settings to cpu etc etc etc.

Hard to do a apples to apples comparision. It's still too early to still pass judgement on the 2900 XT
Redeemed
05-30-07, 11:14 PM
Just wait untill redeemed see this, I'm sure he has something to prove this benchmarks are fake lmao.

Someone will always blame it on the driver... I blame it on the card ;)

Too bad it's just one game and no GTS

I know it's not fake, but Redeemed seems to love AMD, so it wouldn't suprise me if he came in here and declared them to be fake.

(nana2)

:rolleyes:

Considering I own two 640MB GTSs, that I purchased on launch day, and am running and nVidia nForce4 SLi x16 based mobo... I don't see the validity in your statement.

Instead, I see a blind lust you appear to have for nVidia and Intel if you really think that the 2900XT can only get 8fps in that game. Where are the in-game screenshots with the FPS counter showing only 8 frames per second? Anybody could have made that graph.