Post Your Geforce Fx Benchmarks Here..

[Rogozhin]

ugapug

i will try your settings and see if it can publish it!

rogo

[DanCanovas]

I completely agree with rob hague..
It really is childish. And when u argue back with them..Your just a kid who doesnt know anything! LOL! they dont know how old u are!

[Nutty]

Isn't "Application" mode better quality than "quality" mode tho?

Are you guys using application or quality intellisample settings?

You cant publish probably because mad onion has blocked your drivers. Doesn't it only allow WHQL drivers now?

[Rogozhin]

Nutty, i think you're right

Ugapug

Here is my score with 8x peformance AF, and 4x AA.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=562065

1922

rogo

[gravioli]

Originally posted by Nutty
Isn't "Application" mode better quality than "quality" mode tho?


Yes. As far as I know, "Quality" mode used to be known as "Balanced". Application is really the "Quality" mode.

[Rogozhin]

I want to see those FX scores with AA and AF and set to application.

rogo

[RobHague]

1080 something 3dmarks i get with max AA,AF and image quality set to Application.

[Rogozhin]

Yes Quality is now the faster of the settings when comparing "quality" and "application"

This is what nvidia is now recomending reviewers to test for their benchmarking.

What a load of convoluted crap.

This means that when you compare the IQ of a radeon to an fx the radeon is actually doing it's highest IQ when the FX is lowering its IQ because of nividia using sophistry to gain points in their benchmarks.

Fecking Bullly's

rogo

[Rogozhin]

Thanks Rob!

Rogo

[Rogozhin]

Rob

I got around 1450 with 8x quality and 6x AA, just for compare. I will post it.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=557517

[RobHague]

Ok it seems my key is not valid so thats why it wont let me upload. So i will post them in here manually.

These were the settings

16x FSAA, 8x AF - IntelliSample set to "Application"

(16x AA definatley has huge impacts the performance, the difference between 8x and 16x enabled with the DAWN demo is quite noticiable. I think its meant for 3d rendering apps only, definatley not a gaming option.)

3DMark Score 1084 3DMarks
GT1 - Wings of Fury 37.3 fps
GT2 - Battle of Proxycon 5.6 fps
GT3 - Troll's Lair 5.3 fps
GT4 - Mother Nature 9.2 fps
CPU Score 384 CPUMarks
CPU Test 1 38.5 fps
CPU Test 2 7.5 fps
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 256718559.0 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 891801086.0 MTexels/s
Vertex Shader 9.5 fps
Pixel Shader 2.0 16.4 fps
Ragtroll 4.1 fps
No sounds 29.4 fps
24 sounds 26.0 fps
60 sounds 23.3 fps

edit - I will do a benchmark @ 6x AA (or whatever's closest, think ill try 8x) and 8x AF, with the Application Image Quality and post the results.