PDA

View Full Version : BioShock DirectX 10 vs DirectX 9 Performance and Image Quality


[EOCF] Tim
08-24-07, 07:11 PM
Source : Firingsquad (http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/bioshock_directx10_performance/)

Boy am I glad I went G80.

The 320mb 8800GTS beating the 2900XT in every resolution, including beating the 1Gb version in all but one resolution. 6fps faster on average, and that's just the 320mb. Wow.

|MaguS|
08-24-07, 07:16 PM
Yay! Another Bioshock thread!

Tork64
08-24-07, 07:16 PM
Tim']Source : Firingsquad (http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/bioshock_directx10_performance/)

Boy am I glad I went G80.


QFT, only ATI card I ever bought was the 9700 pro, after that its Nvidia 2 times in a row.

ccxvi
08-24-07, 07:26 PM
I'm not sold on those benchmarks yet, since AA was at 0. For all I know, AA will bring the GeForce 8s to a crawl faster than ATI's cards.

3DBrad
08-24-07, 07:29 PM
CCX, in some benchmarks, the x1900xtx beats the 2900xt when anti-aliasing is turned on. :p

XxDeadlyxX
08-24-07, 08:01 PM
CCX, in some benchmarks, the x1900xtx beats the 2900xt when anti-aliasing is turned on. :p

Ooookay? :o

SH64
08-24-07, 09:15 PM
Hmm no performance difference between DX9 & 10 ?!

i'm almost certain DX10 ran slower for me than DX9+4xAA.

Eliminator
08-24-07, 10:03 PM
wow the GTX/Ultra really pull up ahead of the GTS here