View Full Version : New OpenGL Fur Rendering Benchmark
MaXThReAT
08-27-07, 04:33 PM
Pretty cool little benchmark came out a few days ago. I was going to let someone ells post it but I havn't seen anything yet so here it is.
The graphics settings for the standard benchmark are:
Resolution: 1280x1024
Fullcreen
No MSAA (None)
Duration: 60 sec (60000 ms).
In Vista, I score 2282 just under the 2306 of a Intel Core 2 Duo 6600 2.4GHz / 2048M DDR2 667 / Mobo Asus p5w deluxe 8800 GTX 768M GDDR3 PCI-Exp - default clocks. I love my system :D , I'm so glad I didn't jump on the C2D bandwangon...yet :D I'll have to optimize and run again to see what I can really do.
http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/fur/
http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/3261/furxk9.jpg
http://img74.imageshack.us/img74/8896/benchmark20070827130936rc5.jpg
Logical
08-27-07, 04:57 PM
CBA registering....maybe host it on files upload or similar!
So not only DX10 can do fur shading now huh ? :D
anyway thanks for the info!
MaXThReAT
08-27-07, 11:00 PM
CBA registering....maybe host it on files upload or similar!
Sorry I didn't DL from that site directly. I didn't want to link to this site but It's aval on that other site, you know the one that sucks compared to nV News. The one with the U and the G and the other U and the damn R with the 3D. Yeah that one. I don't link to that inconsiderate, steeling hellhole unless I have to. Anyway I think it's great that score just under a 2.4Ghz C2D 6600.
edit
I just Re-Benched in nice highly optimized XP system and beat their 2.4Ghz C2D and I'm only at 2.5Ghz I could go 2.6 but it's hot in here.
C2D: 2306
Vista: 2282
XP: 2312
http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/4769/2312lr1.jpg
CaptNKILL
08-27-07, 11:19 PM
bahaha... a fuzzy donut... :p
My score:
[ Score: 2284 o3Marks ] - Time=60 sec
Window Params: 1280x1024 - MSAA: 0X
FPS Min:32 FPS Max:50 FPS Avg:38
EDIT: BTW MaxThreat, this is a hardware OpenGL benchmark, thats why CPU power doesn't seem to make any difference. I have a 3.6Ghz Core 2 Duo and we are scoring nearly the same. Its because its 100% GPU dependent.
stncttr908
08-28-07, 12:32 AM
Does this absolutely destroy anyone else's core temps? :headexplode:
Libertysyclone
08-28-07, 01:09 AM
I am not sure that this bench is right...
Here are a few different results... highest score is a stock clock SLI 8800 Ultra
Then a OC'd Ultra second
AND the biggest suprise look at the Quadro FX5600!!! THE top of the line of all current Open GL cards???
http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c133/libertysyclone/untitled5.jpg
http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c133/libertysyclone/Untitled.jpg
http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c133/libertysyclone/untitled-1.jpg
CaptNKILL
08-28-07, 03:02 PM
Yeah I dont think this is a very good benchmark. Seems like the results are totally random and inaccurate for the most part.
Logical
08-28-07, 04:17 PM
That fur still looks cool though :D:D:D:D
Libertysyclone
08-28-07, 04:47 PM
It looks great on the Quadro FX 5600 very smooth FPS better than the Ultra visually.
Eliminator
08-28-07, 08:49 PM
2395 on my system with 24/7 clocks: E6400 @ 3.3GHZ and 8800GTX @ 600/1950
Crisao23
08-30-07, 02:09 AM
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/7830/clipboard30pg1.jpg (https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/1174)
2644 with the 8800GTX running at 660/2040
Vista x64 Ultimate with 163.44 Forceware
A second try:
http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/8100/clipboard33ds0.jpg (https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/1174)
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.