View Full Version : Crysis Beta Feedback Thread
fixed . But is the 1,0 version
so AA doesnt work in the latest beta or what are you saying?
the AA works , but I not have one comparative as in the 1.0 version
I wish that you guys would quit posting thumbnails to imageshack. They never work. Half the time they either send you to a broken link or don't blow the picture up full-size--even when maximizing your browser. It's difficult to tell true picture quality that way.
I get this from every one of Jonelo's links:
http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/2636/brokency6.jpg
When you link the images, pull the "hotlink for forums (1)" link, instead. It always works. For example:
http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/7013/abzsizedbx2.jpg
It is not a good irony . These links were copied of a forum in other format , which adds automatic http: // in the links and they were incorrect . It is ironic because I have account of subcriptor the imageshack and the whole process this one automated. And I do not need to look for the link " Hotlink for forums (1) " to put the direct link
http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/7329/kkhgkjkjc0.th.jpg (http://img518.imageshack.us/my.php?image=kkhgkjkjc0.jpg)
http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/5573/kkhgkjkll5.jpg
Turican
09-16-07, 10:28 AM
hm too boring here,any links to boards with more active tester and pics :D
MrSavoy
09-16-07, 10:41 AM
Jonelo whats your system specs, I'm curious. Thanks.
mcbacker
09-16-07, 10:48 AM
8800gtx c2 2750 mhz
Why don't u put this info in your sig?
I saw u answering this at least 10 times xD
MC
nvyou939
09-16-07, 10:49 AM
Indoor screens please. :P
Turican
09-16-07, 11:40 AM
Some are in the thread
wrong answer :D
Destroy
09-16-07, 11:43 AM
Indoor screens please. :P
http://www.asseenontvguys.com/ProductImages/instant_door_screen.jpg
http://www.asseenontvguys.com/ProductImages/instant_door_screen.jpg
Holy ****, that some nice alpha textures + AA in action :afro: :D
Holy ****, that some nice alpha textures + AA in action :afro: :D
meh, the textures look abit washed out cartoonish.
californian1
09-16-07, 02:20 PM
8800gtx c2 2750 mhz
c2d?? cool
is that gtx at stock or whats the clock??
SILVEREGTS
09-16-07, 02:32 PM
8800gtx c2 2750 mhz
What are you doing with a Core 2 duo at only 2750mhz? push that bad boy till it :headexplode:
Fats_43
09-16-07, 02:44 PM
What are you doing with a Core 2 duo at only 2750mhz? push that bad boy till it :headexplode:
Sometimes you can't because you may have crappy ram like me :(
CaptNKILL
09-16-07, 02:53 PM
http://www.asseenontvguys.com/ProductImages/instant_door_screen.jpg
:lol:
With the stock cooler .
3.2Ghz with stockcooler.
you are to chicken man :)
Bump it UP!
Does the frame rate take a dive when you are in densely wooded areas? And Jonelo please add your system specs to your sig to stop people asking.
3.2Ghz with stockcooler.
you are to chicken man :)
Bump it UP!
3,2 ghz and the fan at 100 % ? . No . 3,2 is a 15 % /20 fps more of fps in scenes of cpu bount, not is significative . . I not have now a better cooler - I have a Ninja but has the clips wrong . Later I will migrate my system to one HTPC and I need other Heatsink type , no more 14cm height
Medium and high no AA
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/jonelo/Crysis2007-09-1618-11-34-12.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/jonelo/Crysis2007-09-1618-07-21-00.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/jonelo/Crysis2007-09-1618-11-02-87.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/jonelo/Crysis2007-09-1618-10-26-65.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/jonelo/Crysis2007-09-1618-12-47-34.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/jonelo/Crysis2007-09-1618-06-07-87.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/jonelo/Crysis2007-09-1618-21-22-81-1.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/jonelo/Crysis2007-09-1618-19-22-17.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/jonelo/Crysis2007-09-1618-14-33-28.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/jonelo/Crysis2007-09-1618-04-14-71.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/jonelo/Crysis2007-09-1618-14-17-67.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/jonelo/Crysis2007-09-1618-04-13-09.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/jonelo/Crysis2007-09-1618-01-41-96.jpg
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y117/jonelo/Crysis2007-09-1618-02-33-73.jpg
The great diferences in game are
The lighting - more clear and maybe with oclusion mapping ? in high, more darker and maybe without HDR . The lighting in high offers more jaggies . The AA no work in medium . The lighting in high is much realistic , only is posible see this in all extension in game .
The textures . Except the far mountains of the later picture, but in high we have clougs, fog, calima
The shader of the water is much better in high.
DeusGear
09-16-07, 04:54 PM
Meh, no more screens from me because SlamDunk is a dirty snitch.
http://i4.tinypic.com/4vdqrk1.jpg
3,2 ghz and the fan at 100 % ?
the fan is not running at 100% even at 3.2Ghz.
im talkning about the stockcooler here.
if you start to hear the fan then you are in trouble :)
Turican
09-16-07, 04:59 PM
medium and high is ugly :thumbdwn:
only pics with max settings please :POKE:
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.