PDA

View Full Version : Crysis Beta Feedback Thread


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 [54] 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93

Bokishi
09-19-07, 02:21 AM
Yeah man whats up with the high high?

Jonelo
09-19-07, 02:30 AM
http://rapidshare.com/files/56713329/Crysis_2007-09-19_06-40-34-39.avi

Dreamingawake
09-19-07, 02:33 AM
R u going to let us in on the secret ?? :)

gulizard
09-19-07, 02:37 AM
Yeah for real let us know how the hell you done that dude.

NVM figured it out I'll tell ya if ya wanna know pm me.

gulizard
09-19-07, 03:04 AM
Just pm me don't want my account canceled for the beta.

Jonelo
09-19-07, 03:15 AM
@ jonelo

How did you get the settings to ultra high?!?!? those screens look amazing!!!


I do not know it, i believe that the settings are working , because the performance is much worse. Modify some files ini of the game

Therk
09-19-07, 03:19 AM
Can somebody get some low and medium setting screenshots and performance figures for me at 800x600 - 1280x1024? Especially somebody with a low end - mainstream card. I.e. from 6600 GT up to 7900GS. I got a 6800GS currently and I'm hoping to run it on 1024x768 low settings 30 fps average.

wysiwyg
09-19-07, 03:57 AM
so when i get home from work grrrrrr

what will i need to edit on the ini file?

(i will be running crysis on vista 32)

Arioch
09-19-07, 03:59 AM
I saw a post by a Crytek dev that acknowledged that SLI is not working correectly and stated that they are working with Nvidia on it. Seeing as I am getting low 20's average FPS at 1920x1200 with 8xAF/2xAA with very high settings I am hoping that working SLI will get me into the low 30s, which I would be perfectly content with in the single player portion of the game.

XxDeadlyxX
09-19-07, 03:59 AM
Can somebody get some low and medium setting screenshots and performance figures for me at 800x600 - 1280x1024? Especially somebody with a low end - mainstream card. I.e. from 6600 GT up to 7900GS. I got a 6800GS currently and I'm hoping to run it on 1024x768 low settings 30 fps average.

That may be possible but only if you have a decent CPU... top end AMD dual or any Core 2 duo... because even for me at 1024x768 low settings I don't get much over 30fps with system in sig. Supposedly its better on XP though so if you're on XP you have a better chance of it running ok.

huzdi
09-19-07, 04:36 AM
That may be possible but only if you have a decent CPU... top end AMD dual or any Core 2 duo... because even for me at 1024x768 low settings I don't get much over 30fps with system in sig. Supposedly its better on XP though so if you're on XP you have a better chance of it running ok.

What...the...hell, I hope your graphics card isn't the bottleneck cause Im just running a stock 8800gts 640, 2gb of ram and amd x2 6000+. I built this computer hoping that I would be able to play crysis pretty freaking good, and a low res with low settings is extremly disapointing. Now admittedly I kind of regret not doing more research on the build and most likly finding out that a q6600 would be a better processor to go with, however whats done is done and I hope to upgrade to a amd triple or quad core depending on prices when they come out as well as either using my evga step up in november to go to a 9800gtx if its released or pick up a 8800gtx before the step up runs out.

Anyways Im not familiar with your cpu but I really hope that is the bottleneck because something doen't seem right if that is the kind performance you are getting with the second best graphics card on the market. They said that the engine would scale back 2 years. I guess the only way I will find out is wait for the demo and sees how it runs on my machine but geese that sucks.

KasuCode
09-19-07, 04:43 AM
What...the...hell, I hope your graphics card isn't the bottleneck cause Im just running a stock 8800gts 640, 2gb of ram and amd x2 6000+. I built this computer hoping that I would be able to play crysis pretty freaking good, and a low res with low settings is extremly disapointing. Now admittedly I kind of regret not doing more research on the build and most likly finding out that a q6600 would be a better processor to go with, however whats done is done and I hope to upgrade to a amd triple or quad core depending on prices when they come out as well as either using my evga step up in november to go to a 9800gtx if its released or pick up a 8800gtx before the step up runs out.

Anyways Im not familiar with your cpu but I really hope that is the bottleneck because something doen't seem right if that is the kind performance you are getting with the second best graphics card on the market. They said that the engine would scale back 2 years. I guess the only way I will find out is wait for the demo and sees how it runs on my machine but geese that sucks.


I would wait for the demo before judging performance.

neosin
09-19-07, 05:02 AM
Just pm me don't want my account canceled for the beta.

hey gulizard can u reply to me please :) thanks

anyone else know can u please pm me thank you, i can get to very high but not "custom" is custom ultra? thanks

K007
09-19-07, 05:38 AM
He is on Vista i assume.

Wonder why SLI was not given much attention before the release of the demo :O.

XxDeadlyxX
09-19-07, 06:12 AM
What...the...hell, I hope your graphics card isn't the bottleneck cause Im just running a stock 8800gts 640, 2gb of ram and amd x2 6000+. I built this computer hoping that I would be able to play crysis pretty freaking good, and a low res with low settings is extremly disapointing. Now admittedly I kind of regret not doing more research on the build and most likly finding out that a q6600 would be a better processor to go with, however whats done is done and I hope to upgrade to a amd triple or quad core depending on prices when they come out as well as either using my evga step up in november to go to a 9800gtx if its released or pick up a 8800gtx before the step up runs out.

Anyways Im not familiar with your cpu but I really hope that is the bottleneck because something doen't seem right if that is the kind performance you are getting with the second best graphics card on the market. They said that the engine would scale back 2 years. I guess the only way I will find out is wait for the demo and sees how it runs on my machine but geese that sucks.

My CPU would only be limiting me slightly, its not THAT bad.. its equivalent to a stock E6400 or FX-62... I think its a combination of everything - CPU, GFX (due to drivers or just being plain not fast enough... but that seems weird as Crytek said the game will work good on older systems... 8800GTS is pretty damn new) and the fact I'm running it on Vista.

The audio and graphics bugs I get just adds to it too. Really weird things too.. not just when playing, ie. when I am changing settings in menu not in a server the screen will sometimes turn a weird colour.

Also there are NO aussie servers and joining the servers there actually are is troublesome... often tries to connect for awhile and won't, then randomly will when I try again.

neosin
09-19-07, 06:13 AM
just to all the folks that wanna know how the 2900xt is doing on the beta i've compared mine against Jonelo's gtx although his cpu is 400 mghz faster than mine on the 8X AA settings same settings same place where he took the screens my 2900xt gets about 2-3 frames slower than the gtx with 8aa settings :P and pretty much the same without aa

specs q6600 at 2.4ghz (since beta is onli using 2 cores his dual core is at 2.8ghz or somthin
2900xt 512
2gb ddr 2 800
vista

havent tried xp yet but i'm sure its faster :P and alsot ati hasn't released any drivers yet lik nvidia has :P
i'm sure the 2900xt will gain that 2-3fps and match if not beat the gtx in the demo even with 8aa

with 2aa i get about -2fps loss which is awsome

mumstheword
09-19-07, 06:15 AM
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/25010.html

Yay for nvidia :)

The guy looks like a mess, as if he hasn't slept in weeks.

Crisao23
09-19-07, 06:37 AM
Some screens from the game:

http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2404/crysis2007091815304862ya4.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2404/crysis2007091815304862ya4.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6508/crysis2007091815335788el2.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6508/crysis2007091815335788el2.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2729/crysis2007091815341289sz2.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2729/crysis2007091815341289sz2.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6724/crysis2007091815350500dv6.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6724/crysis2007091815350500dv6.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6460/crysis2007091815350687ko6.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6460/crysis2007091815350687ko6.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2792/crysis2007091818191123bo4.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2792/crysis2007091818191123bo4.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2707/crysis2007091818193978ee9.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2707/crysis2007091818193978ee9.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/1435/crysis2007091818205551kx2.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/1435/crysis2007091818205551kx2.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/9161/crysis2007091818211730wq0.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/9161/crysis2007091818211730wq0.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6467/crysis2007091818215666fl7.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6467/crysis2007091818215666fl7.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2207/crysis2007091818221846nn3.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2207/crysis2007091818221846nn3.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/3541/crysis2007091818223257ia4.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/3541/crysis2007091818223257ia4.jpg)

Crisao23
09-19-07, 06:38 AM
http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/7452/crysis2007091818224287hb1.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/7452/crysis2007091818224287hb1.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2434/crysis2007091818225292jm3.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2434/crysis2007091818225292jm3.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/4259/crysis2007091818230119ea1.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/4259/crysis2007091818230119ea1.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/51/crysis2007091818234311ai1.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/51/crysis2007091818234311ai1.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/9038/crysis2007091818240205il6.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/9038/crysis2007091818240205il6.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2260/crysis2007091818241135wn1.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2260/crysis2007091818241135wn1.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/3360/crysis2007091818243032dk4.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/3360/crysis2007091818243032dk4.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/9716/crysis2007091818243260ve7.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/9716/crysis2007091818243260ve7.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/1466/crysis2007091818251390oo9.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/1466/crysis2007091818251390oo9.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/1492/crysis2007091818255982pr8.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/1492/crysis2007091818255982pr8.jpg) http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6672/crysis2007091818262300sa6.th.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6672/crysis2007091818262300sa6.jpg)

Settings are on "very high", actually it's a "fake" very high, since it doesn't change anything. You just need to edit a file for it.

XxDeadlyxX
09-19-07, 06:50 AM
This is a good example of the bad sprites I'm talking about from one of the above pictures.. I mean surely they would have figured out a better way to do it than that... heck even Far Cry doesn't look that bad I don't think...I hope this is fixed in DX10 and/or proper Very High settings:

http://aycu06.webshots.com/image/29045/2003559089146147646_rs.jpg

mumstheword
09-19-07, 06:59 AM
Killer shots Crisao. Whats your specs and what frame rates u getting?

mumstheword
09-19-07, 07:10 AM
Deadly, when you move a few feet closer it looks fine. It's probably just their method of conserving VRAM. I haven't noticed this at all until you pointed it out.

gulizard
09-19-07, 07:10 AM
I beg to differ it changes. The game obviously looks better on Very High.. Compared them. I won't post pics because I am not an NDA violator... Prefer to keep my beta account if Doc is for real.

mumstheword
09-19-07, 07:17 AM
I beg to differ it changes. The game obviously looks better on Very High.. Compared them. I won't post pics because I am not an NDA violator... Prefer to keep my beta account if Doc is for real.

There's no difference, sorry. It's impossible. You're just seeing things.

gulizard
09-19-07, 07:37 AM
Really go back a page or so thats a huge difference. The physics look better, and the vehicles look better. Theres rays, and everything. I am not seeing things Very High looks better, and even the damn sound on very high is a lot louder and clearer/