Linuxhippy

10-08-07, 01:00 PM

Hello,

I am currently converting a software-only 2D graphics library to use fragment-shaders for at least the most expensive operations (it will still be mixed CPU/GPU).

What I wonder is how do newer Low-End boards perform compared to the (old&ugly&slow) FX5200 for pixel-shaders?

Could the following table be correct, and how would you rate pixel-shader performance for ??-marked cards compared to the FX5200/NV34:

FX5200: 100%

GF6200: 150%

GF7300: 300%

GF8400: ???%

X300: 150% (??)

X1300: ???%

HD2400: ???%

Of course I don't expect precise numbers, just a vague approximation what I can expect from those cards.

Thank you in advance, lg Clemens

I am currently converting a software-only 2D graphics library to use fragment-shaders for at least the most expensive operations (it will still be mixed CPU/GPU).

What I wonder is how do newer Low-End boards perform compared to the (old&ugly&slow) FX5200 for pixel-shaders?

Could the following table be correct, and how would you rate pixel-shader performance for ??-marked cards compared to the FX5200/NV34:

FX5200: 100%

GF6200: 150%

GF7300: 300%

GF8400: ???%

X300: 150% (??)

X1300: ???%

HD2400: ???%

Of course I don't expect precise numbers, just a vague approximation what I can expect from those cards.

Thank you in advance, lg Clemens