<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>nV News Forums - NVIDIA Linux</title>
		<link>http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin</link>
		<description>Support forum for running NVIDIA based graphics under Linux.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:33:30 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Lockup Using VDPAU on F12</title>
			<link>http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141625&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:11:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Playing H264 video on F12 x86_64 with VDPAU via XBMC causes a hard lock-up.  The bug report doesn't contain the kernel stack trace, but I grabbed it from a previous lock-up.  It happens when the video first starts or 5-10 minutes in.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Playing H264 video on F12 x86_64 with VDPAU via XBMC causes a hard lock-up.  The bug report doesn't contain the kernel stack trace, but I grabbed it from a previous lock-up.  It happens when the video first starts or 5-10 minutes in.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	

	

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Files</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/images/attach/gz.gif" alt="File Type: gz" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/attachment.php?attachmentid=38708&amp;d=1258783827">nvidia-bug-report.log.gz</a> (32.4 KB)</td>
</tr><tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/images/attach/gz.gif" alt="File Type: gz" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/attachment.php?attachmentid=38709&amp;d=1258783827">kernel.txt.gz</a> (1.3 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
		</fieldset>
	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=14">NVIDIA Linux</category>
			<dc:creator>aronparsons</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141625</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>geforce 7600GT / nvclock question</title>
			<link>http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141622&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:26:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Currently, I have a geforce 7600GT here that I was sent though I had ordered a geforce 7600GS!

First question:
Should I stay with the 7600GT instead? Looks like it is better than the 7600GS, right?

Second and more important question:
nvclock -i tells me among other things:

-- Memory info...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Currently, I have a geforce 7600GT here that I was sent though I had ordered a geforce 7600GS!<br />
<br />
First question:<br />
Should I stay with the 7600GT instead? Looks like it is better than the 7600GS, right?<br />
<br />
Second and more important question:<br />
nvclock -i tells me among other things:<br />
<br />
-- Memory info --<br />
Amount:         512 MB<br />
Type:           128 bit DDR<br />
Clock:          265.500 MHz<br />
<br />
-- Sensor info --<br />
Sensor: GPU Internal Sensor<br />
GPU temperature: 54C<br />
<br />
-- VideoBios information --<br />
Version: 05.73.22.40.01<br />
Signon message: GeForce 7600 GT VGA BIOS<br />
Performance level 0: gpu 400MHz/memory 532MHz/1.10V/100%<br />
<br />
<br />
So the core clock is 400 MHz, and the memory clock 532 MHz (2x266).<br />
<br />
<br />
I wonder if this is okay this way, or if I got some product of inferior quality...<br />
<br />
The &quot;Axle nvidia geforce 7600GT&quot; is being advertized as having a core clock of 400 MHz and a memory clock of 800 MHz.<br />
<br />
So I ask myself why nvclock shows me only 532 Mhz... <br />
<br />
<br />
Since I am no expert here, let me have a guess:<br />
Is the 532 MHz due to the FSB of my old motherboard (K7S41GX), 2x133MHz=266MHz, not 532 MHz, though...<br />
<br />
But is this the reason for the nvclock results?<br />
And would nvclock show me the advertized 800 MHz if I had a more recent system?<br />
<br />
Sorry if this sounds all too easy and if it is not precisely Linux specific, but not everybody outside of Linux knows anything about nvclock, and I think, we have some good experts here.<br />
<br />
I also noticed that my glxgears fps values at 1680x1050, 16 bit depth, are only around 6800 (with AGP 8x) enabled and not like the 10000 or more fps that I often find reports about... This is with nvclock default values of 400 core and 532 memory clock.<br />
<br />
Overclocking those values caused a drastic increase in fps, though.<br />
<br />
<br />
Thanks, especially for answers to my question about the memory clock!<br />
<br />
<br />
Petersen</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=14">NVIDIA Linux</category>
			<dc:creator>Petersen</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141622</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Install on slack64 fails if run in a script with installer options</title>
			<link>http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141621&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:51:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I am attempting to install the driver on Slackware64, using the standard 'huge' kernel.

If I run the installer with the following command line:
   NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-190.42-pkg2.run
it completes with no problems. The driver appears to work as well.

If I run it in a script, with the following...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I am attempting to install the driver on Slackware64, using the standard 'huge' kernel.<br />
<br />
If I run the installer with the following command line:<br />
   NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-190.42-pkg2.run<br />
it completes with no problems. The driver appears to work as well.<br />
<br />
If I run it in a script, with the following command line:<br />
   NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-190.42-pkg2.run \<br />
   --accept-license \<br />
   --no-network \<br />
   --no-questions \<br />
   --silent<br />
I get the following error:<br />
<br />
<br />
-&gt; Performing Xen check.<br />
ERROR: The kernel you are installing for is a Xen kernel!<br />
<br />
The NVIDIA driver does not currently work on Xen kernels. If<br />
you are using a stock distribution kernel, please install<br />
a variant of this kernel without Xen support; if this is a<br />
custom kernel, please install a standard Linux kernel. Then<br />
try installing the NVIDIA kernel module again.<br />
ERROR: Installation has failed. Please see the file<br />
'/var/log/nvidia-installer.log' for details. You may find suggestions<br />
on fixing installation problems in the README available on the Linux<br />
driver download page at <a href="http://www.nvidia.com" target="_blank">www.nvidia.com</a>.<br />
<br />
<br />
I am not positive how the installer is determining that I have a Xen kernel, but I would expect it to do the same check (and the log says it does) when running without the options.<br />
<br />
The reason that I am attempting to run the installer in a script is that I convert everything I install on my machines into a slackware package. This allows me to recover from any disk crashes, etc with minimal downtime. This also provides me with a documentation trail on how to install these additional items.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=14">NVIDIA Linux</category>
			<dc:creator>jimfitz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141621</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>New libvdpau released 0.3</title>
			<link>http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141620&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:22:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hello,

new vdpau released: 0.3.
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-announce/2009-November/001200.html</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hello,<br />
<br />
new vdpau released: 0.3.<br />
<a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-announce/2009-November/001200.html" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/archive...er/001200.html</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=14">NVIDIA Linux</category>
			<dc:creator>zbiggy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141620</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>glxgears is 5 fps</title>
			<link>http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141619&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:07:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Seems like glxgears and 3D screensavers are not accelerated after installing the 190.42 driver.  Everything else is working great (rotated twinview, compositing).  6600GT that was properly accelerated on Mandriva 2008 + 180.60.  Not properly 3D accelerated under Mandriva 2010 + 190.42

Is there...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Seems like glxgears and 3D screensavers are not accelerated after installing the 190.42 driver.  Everything else is working great (rotated twinview, compositing).  6600GT that was properly accelerated on Mandriva 2008 + 180.60.  Not properly 3D accelerated under Mandriva 2010 + 190.42<br />
<br />
Is there something obviously incorrect below?<br />
<br />
# ldd /usr/bin/glxgears<blockquote>linux-vdso.so.1 =&gt;  (0x00007ffffe7ff000)<br />
libGL.so.1 =&gt; /usr/lib64/nvidia-current/libGL.so.1 (0x00007fb2b4c88000)<br />
libm.so.6 =&gt; /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007fb2b4a06000)<br />
libc.so.6 =&gt; /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fb2b46a8000)<br />
libX11.so.6 =&gt; /usr/lib64/libX11.so.6 (0x00007fb2b436e000)<br />
libGLcore.so.1 =&gt; /usr/lib64/nvidia-current/libGLcore.so.1 (0x00007fb2b2f11000)<br />
libnvidia-tls.so.1 =&gt; /usr/lib64/nvidia-current/tls/libnvidia-tls.so.1 (0x00007fb2b4f7b000)<br />
libXext.so.6 =&gt; /usr/lib64/libXext.so.6 (0x00007fb2b2cff000)<br />
libdl.so.2 =&gt; /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fb2b2afb000)<br />
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fb2b4e80000)<br />
libxcb.so.1 =&gt; /usr/lib64/libxcb.so.1 (0x00007fb2b28df000)<br />
libXau.so.6 =&gt; /usr/lib64/libXau.so.6 (0x00007fb2b26dc000)<br />
libXdmcp.so.6 =&gt; /usr/lib64/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x00007fb2b24d6000)</blockquote>#</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=14">NVIDIA Linux</category>
			<dc:creator>xorbe</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141619</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NVIDIA(0): Failed to allocate clip rectangle in kdm.log</title>
			<link>http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141614&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:30:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi.  Recently upgraded from kubuntu 9.04 to kubuntu 9.10.  Ever since, unable to launch the x windows.

kdm.log reports this:

(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to allocate clip rectangle
(EE) NVIDIA(0):  *** Aborting ***
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to allocate clip rectangle
(EE) NVIDIA(0):  *** Aborting ***
(EE)...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi.  Recently upgraded from kubuntu 9.04 to kubuntu 9.10.  Ever since, unable to launch the x windows.<br />
<br />
kdm.log reports this:<br />
<br />
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to allocate clip rectangle<br />
(EE) NVIDIA(0):  *** Aborting ***<br />
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to allocate clip rectangle<br />
(EE) NVIDIA(0):  *** Aborting ***<br />
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to allocate clip rectangle<br />
(EE) NVIDIA(0):  *** Aborting ***<br />
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to allocate clip rectangle<br />
(EE) NVIDIA(0):  *** Aborting ***<br />
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Error recovery failed.<br />
(EE) NVIDIA(0):  *** Aborting ***<br />
<br />
and that's it.  Black &amp; blank screen.  :(<br />
<br />
Can you please help?  Coming from a Solaris world, a bit disheartened here.<br />
<br />
Thank you!</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=14">NVIDIA Linux</category>
			<dc:creator>logastellus</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141614</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>twinview + rotate, no randr</title>
			<link>http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141613&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:08:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Because I have my panels rotated using TwinView and XRandR is automatically disabled, every time I start a program it spews out:
*Xlib: extension "RANDR" missing on display ":0.0".*
Yes, I'm well aware of that.  How to I squelch this noise?  Thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Because I have my panels rotated using TwinView and XRandR is automatically disabled, every time I start a program it spews out:<br />
<blockquote><b>Xlib: extension &quot;RANDR&quot; missing on display &quot;:0.0&quot;.</b></blockquote>Yes, I'm well aware of that.  How to I squelch this noise?  Thanks!</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=14">NVIDIA Linux</category>
			<dc:creator>xorbe</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141613</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Gnome-shell with TripleBuffer enabled crashes X.org</title>
			<link>http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141610&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[As the title says... when tripplebuffer is enabled in x.org, starting gnome-shell will crash X imediately. I'm using nvidia-driver 190.42 on a thinkpad R61 with quadro NVS140. The X.org-Server is  1.6.5 (Debian unstable).
It would be real nice if both could run together as tripplebuffer increases...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>As the title says... when tripplebuffer is enabled in x.org, starting gnome-shell will crash X imediately. I'm using nvidia-driver 190.42 on a thinkpad R61 with quadro NVS140. The X.org-Server is  1.6.5 (Debian unstable).<br />
It would be real nice if both could run together as tripplebuffer increases speed with normal metacity enormous for me.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=14">NVIDIA Linux</category>
			<dc:creator>packermann</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141610</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Flickering below mouse pointer</title>
			<link>http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141605&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I have this strange problem that the screen flickers, but only the part that is lower than the current mouse pointer position. The temporary fix is to keep the pointer at the bottom of the screen but I'm looking for something more permanent. The flickering occurs when there is a lot of graphics to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have this strange problem that the screen flickers, but only the part that is lower than the current mouse pointer position. The temporary fix is to keep the pointer at the bottom of the screen but I'm looking for something more permanent. The flickering occurs when there is a lot of graphics to refresh on the screen, e.g. scrolling through Picasa, loading a very large image in Firefox, watching a video in Totem. <br />
<br />
I have an nVidia GeForce 8200, the latest 190.42 drivers, and Ubuntu 9.10 64-bit. The problem doesn't occur if I load the standard drivers that come with Ubuntu, but that forces me into a lower resolution. I attach a bug report log. <br />
<br />
I'd be grateful if anyone could help because I've been searching for a solution for a long time now. Thanks!</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	

	

	

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Files</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/images/attach/gz.gif" alt="File Type: gz" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/attachment.php?attachmentid=38706&amp;d=1258737947">nvidia-bug-report.log.gz</a> (62.0 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
		</fieldset>
	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=14">NVIDIA Linux</category>
			<dc:creator>SSSimon</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=141605</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
