![]() |
KMS?
Any plans for it?
People who want it may leave their comments here. |
Re: KMS?
A quick search would have answered your question:
http://nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=129253 http://nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=113645 Adam |
Re: KMS?
No Thanks. ATI/Intel can keep all that junk for themselves.
|
Re: KMS?
For now, KMS caused only problems for me.
KMS does (AFAIK): Flicker-free boot experience and "graphical" text mode - i dont see their relevance until the OSS drivers are fixed to have the same level of reliance as nvidia's. The reduced boot time is not brought by KMS/Plymouth, but mainly by rearranging the start order of services... Also, i dont care about + 10-20-30 sec boot difference if afterwards i have a system that is rock steady and its reliable. These graphical bells and whistles really should wait until the OSS drivers mature enough to be stable - i would say the devs should channel their energy to make better/more stable drivers not introducing new features that are purely (maybe i am mistaken here, but this is all i see) cosmetic in nature. I am a Nvidia user but i(and not only i suppose) would really like an Intel driver that is stable and uses the 4500's full capacity - there are tons of cheap laptops out there with this card and i have to look for nvidias because those have the only stable Linux drivers. |
Re: KMS?
Quote:
Fedora 13 and the NVIDIA binary work just fine with Plymouth for me, unlike Ubuntu. |
Re: KMS?
gradinaruvasile
KMS is not only flicker-free boot and boot speedup. Around a year ago, some people tried to run X-server not as root, but as regular user and it's requires KMS, so KMS can provide enchanted security. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2013, nV News.