nV News Forums

 
 

nV News Forums (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/index.php)
-   Crysis (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=59)
-   -   Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=155511)

Soetdjuret 09-26-10 01:16 AM

Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JktNjrfojsw&hd=1

67fps average. So is this the rig you need to max out crysis and maintain over 60 fps lol? 3 years after it's release? whahahaha

bob saget 09-26-10 01:37 AM

Re: Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps
 
MONSTER computer. STALKER and HEAVEN benchmarks are so pretty :wonder:

gerardfraser 09-26-10 07:30 PM

Re: Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps
 
What no love for ATI cards.Here a quick vid I did on the snow level in the Video for someone who did not believe my FPS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB8h68S2uj8

Also I might add my 480GTX are not bad either.

red777star 11-04-10 01:28 PM

Re: Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps
 
Crossfire barely works with 2 x HD5870 not to mention quad. It is interesting that he is getting 70FPS in Metro including DOF and Tesse. I had 3 Way Crossfire with HD5870 and whole game run like crap. Same CPU have like a guy in the video.

JasonPC 11-06-10 11:24 PM

Re: Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps
 
red777star strikes again

wysiwyg 11-11-10 06:51 PM

Re: Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps
 
i thought warhead ran maxed out at 1920x1200 pretty smoothly on my single 480

but 4 is only for the rich :(

Soetdjuret 12-19-10 05:21 AM

Re: Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wysiwyg (Post 2346097)
i thought warhead ran maxed out at 1920x1200 pretty smoothly on my single 480

but 4 is only for the rich :(

Maxing out will require you to run 16xQAA in addition to dx10 and enthusiast settings.. and u cant do that on a single 480.

BioHazZarD 12-20-10 05:53 AM

Re: Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps
 
wow not cheap to run a 3 year old game..

Soetdjuret 12-20-10 11:46 AM

Re: Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps
 
In fact, using 16xQAA is pointless, because it doesn't look better than 8ggr AA. Even using 2x2SSAA makes the game look better than using high levels of AA and on the same time being less demanding.

So a 3 years old game. Iš'd say u can max it out using graphics cards for 360 dollars. When i say maxing out, am talking about Very high, dx10, 1920x1200, and 8xAA.. More is not sufficient.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1998 - 2014, nV News.