nV News Forums

 
 

nV News Forums (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/index.php)
-   NVIDIA Linux (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Slower (Performance Regression) 270.x compared to 260.x with GTX460M (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=161721)

gqman69 04-20-11 02:24 PM

Slower (Performance Regression) 270.x compared to 260.x with GTX460M
 
1 Attachment(s)
System

Asus G73JW Notebook
Intel Core i7 740QM
12GB Ram
nVidia GTX460M 1.5GB

Gentoo Linux x86_64
KDE 4.6.2 + Compiz 0.8.8
Kernel 2.6.38.2 (gentoo-sources), 2.6.39-rcX-gitX
gcc 4.5.2

-

Problem

270.x are slower than 260.x

Scrolling in Firefox 4 is erratic, sometimes ok, sometimes choppy.

Even though glxgears is NOT a benchmark...

260.x /w compiz = ~12000fps
270.x /w compiz = ~6000fps

260.x /wo compiz/composite = ~22000fps
270.x /wo compiz/composite = ~10000fps


System under full load, 260.x is excellent and fluid.
System under full load, 270.x is choppy and erratic.

-

Tried different kernels: 2.6.38.2 and 2.6.39-git
Tried different options: Automatic process group scheduling (ON|OFF)
Tried different xorg-server: 1.9.x and 1.10.x

-

With NO other changes switching back to 260.x fixes all issues.

-

nvidia.conf in modprobe.d (tried with none, tried with no MSI, tried with about everything unimaginable).

Code:

options nvidia NVreg_DeviceFileMode=432 NVreg_DeviceFileUID=0 NVreg_DeviceFileGID=27 NVreg_ModifyDeviceFiles=1 NVreg_RegistryDwords="PerfLevelSrc=0x2222" NVreg_Mobile=1 NVreg_EnableMSI=1

Xhondal 04-22-11 10:22 AM

Re: Slower (Performance Regression) 270.x compared to 260.x with GTX460M
 
yes, confirmed here with a 240 gt and 2.6.38.2 kernel.
OpenGl performance are drastically slower than 260.x series, example in 3D modelers.

gqman69 04-22-11 04:27 PM

Re: Slower (Performance Regression) 270.x compared to 260.x with GTX460M
 
There is definitely something fishy about the 270.x driver...

Spent 2 days with them, the performance is erratic...

gqman69 05-20-11 05:26 PM

Re: Slower (Performance Regression) 270.x/275.x compared to 260.x with GTX460M
 
1 Attachment(s)
2 new versions, same problem.

Seems like performance is half of the 260.x series...

2D,3D,Composite,No Composite... KDE, Gnome, Plain X... xorg-server 1.9.x, 1.10.x

MaDDeePee 05-20-11 07:09 PM

Re: Slower (Performance Regression) 270.x compared to 260.x with GTX460M
 
This won't help you, but 270.x doesn't seem so slowdown GF500 series (although its impossible to test it with 260.x drivers)

Everything is fast as it should be....

gqman69 05-21-11 04:47 PM

Re: Slower (Performance Regression) 270.x compared to 260.x with GTX460M
 
Is there anything I could try to isolate the problem?

gqman69 05-23-11 11:24 PM

Re: Slower (Performance Regression) 270.x compared to 260.x with GTX460M
 
Ok, so I have completed the install of my new desktop (Asus P8P67 + 2600K) and a GTX470.

Same thing, I see a performance drop going from 260 to 270.

opengl apps are slower
firefox scrolling is sometimes slower/jerky
compiz is jerky

glxgears is 40-50% slower

pennega 05-24-11 05:54 AM

Re: Slower (Performance Regression) 270.x compared to 260.x with GTX460M
 
I have the same problem with an asus z53jseries and a geforce go7300.
Different kernel (2.6.3X)and different version of X server the perfomance whit the 270 series of driver is bad.
When i run compiz appear this message:

Code:

pennega@pennegaz:~ $ fusion-icon
 * Detected Session: gnome
 * Searching for installed applications...
 * NVIDIA on Xorg detected, exporting: __GL_YIELD=NOTHING
 * Using the GTK Interface
 * Starting Compiz
 ... executing: compiz --replace --sm-disable --ignore-desktop-hints ccp
compiz (video) - Warn: No 8 bit GLX pixmap format, disabling YV12 image format
compiz (colorfilter) - Info: Loading filter negative (item negative).
compiz (colorfilter) - Info: Loading filter negative-green (item negative-green).
compiz (colorfilter) - Info: Loading filter blueish-filter (item blueish-filter).
compiz (colorfilter) - Info: Loading filter sepia (item sepia).
compiz (colorfilter) - Info: Loading filter grayscale (item grayscale).
compiz (colorfilter) - Info: Loading filter deuteranopia (item deuteranopia).
compiz (colorfilter) - Info: Loading filter protonopia (item protonopia).
compiz (colorfilter) - Warn: Tried to load 7 filter(s), 6 succeeded.
^CTraceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/fusion-icon", line 58, in <module>
    choose_interface(try_first=options.interface)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FusionIcon/interface.py", line 89, in choose_interface
    import_interface(chosen_interface)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FusionIcon/interface.py", line 35, in import_interface
    __import__('FusionIcon.interface_%s' %interface)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FusionIcon/interface_gtk/__init__.py", line 3, in <module>
    import main
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FusionIcon/interface_gtk/main.py", line 214, in <module>
    gtk.main()
KeyboardInterrupt

the strange is this

Code:

compiz (video) - Warn: No 8 bit GLX pixmap format, disabling YV12 image format
any idea?

kokoko3k 07-31-11 03:35 AM

Re: Slower (Performance Regression) 270.x compared to 260.x with GTX460M
 
Tested lightsmark and glxgears without compositing

linux 2.6.39-4
geforce 9500GT
nvidia 275.21 and 260.19.44

Lightsmark gives 115.45 fps with 275.21 and 114.3 with 260.19.44
glxgears gives about 6400fps on 275.21 and about 6800 on 260.19.44

So everithing seems ok with this board; as soon as i can i'll try against a 7900gs.

kokoko3k 08-01-11 02:13 AM

Re: Slower (Performance Regression) 270.x compared to 260.x with GTX460M
 
7900GS gives better performance on 280x series too for me.

kriko 08-01-11 04:01 AM

Re: Slower (Performance Regression) 270.x compared to 260.x with GTX460M
 
I've done some benchmarks on my GTS 450 1GB DDR5 with Unigine:

Quote:

driver: 260.19.44
FPS: 43.6
Scores: 1847
Min FPS: 31.1
Max FPS: 50.7
Quote:

driver: 270.41.19
FPS: 43.5
Scores: 1844
Min FPS: 30.9
Max FPS: 50.8
Quote:

driver: 275.19
FPS: 43.5
Scores: 1846
Min FPS: 31.0
Max FPS: 51.1
Quote:

driver: 280.11
FPS: 44.2
Scores: 1875
Min FPS: 31.4
Max FPS: 51.5
Conclusion is that my model is not affected.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.