nV News Forums

 
 

nV News Forums (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/index.php)
-   NVIDIA Legacy Graphics Cards (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   X800 vs 6800 = Voodoo3 vs TNT2 (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=32691)

Ruined 07-21-04 11:11 PM

X800 vs 6800 = Voodoo3 vs TNT2
 
STORY 1:

3dfx launches the Voodoo3 series with a lesser featureset than the TNT2, but it seems faster at first. 3dfx is especially lacking in that they do not yet support 32bit color. 3dfx tells everyone 32bit color makes no difference, and some reviewers regurgitate this.

Nvidia's TNT2 is the rival with 32bit color carried over from its predecessor, but many still stick with 3dfx thanks to the previous two voodoo successes (Voodoo1/Voodoo2) over the Riva competiton (128/tnt). 3dfx needs to convince the public that both their card is faster and 32-bit is unnecessary is unnecessary as without the speed advantage odds are their card would not sell as much due to its lesser featureset. Nvidia's drivers improve, and the card sees great performance gains in many games. Gamers start to switch to TNT2. 3dfx employees start to make claims that its card can actually do quality similar to 32-bit with a special 22-bit color filter, and starts to release driversets emphasizing this. Quake 3 is released and looks to perform best on TNT2 cards. More games start to come out with 32-bit color. Voodoo3 doesn't look quite as appealing anymore; TNT2 interest swells.

***

STORY 2:

ATI launches the X800 series with a lesser featureset than the 6800, but it seems faster at first. ATI is especially lacking in that they do not yet support SM3.0 & FP16 blending for HDR. ATI tells everyone SM3.0 makes no difference, and some reviewers regurgitate this.

Nvida's 6800 is the rival with SM3.0 and FP32 carried over from its predecessor, but many still stick with ATI at first thanks to the previous two Radeon successes (9700/9800) over the GeForce competition (5800/5900). ATI needs to convince the public that both their card is faster and SM3.0 is unnecessary as without the speed advantage odds are their card would not sell as much due to its lesser featureset. Nvidia's drivers improve, and the card sees great performance gains in many games. Gamers start to switch to the 6800. ATI employees start to make claims that its card can actually do functions similar to SM3.0 with special SM2.0 functions, and starts to release driversets emphasizing this. Doom3 is released, and looks to perform best on 6800 cards. More games start to come out with SM3.0 support. X800 doesn't look quite as appealing anymore; 6800 interest swells.

ati == repeating 3dfx's voodoo3 history
nvidia == repeating nvidia's tnt2's history

Pretty funny, eh :)

P.S. -- Also, when comparing ATI vs 3dfx adding features to compete with Nvidia, let's not forget voodoo5 & fxt1 versus x800 & 3dc ;)

-=DVS=- 07-21-04 11:16 PM

Re: X800 vs 6800 = Voodoo3 vs TNT2
 
Why not compare Voodoo 1 with Riva 128 = 5800FX and 9700Pro :lol2: history does repeat it self......

Ruined 07-21-04 11:17 PM

Re: X800 vs 6800 = Voodoo3 vs TNT2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by -=DVS=-
Why not compare Voodoo 1 with Riva 128 = 5800FX and 9700Pro :lol2: history does repeat it self......

Heh, if you read the above I did :)

ChrisRay 07-21-04 11:19 PM

Re: X800 vs 6800 = Voodoo3 vs TNT2
 
I think you are generalizing way too much ruined.

Ruined 07-21-04 11:23 PM

Re: X800 vs 6800 = Voodoo3 vs TNT2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisRay
I think you are generalizing way too much ruined.

oh come on its funny :angel:

besides if i didn't generalize it wouldn't fit my stories perfectly! ;)

ChrisRay 07-21-04 11:25 PM

Re: X800 vs 6800 = Voodoo3 vs TNT2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruined
oh come on its funny :angel:

besides if i didn't generalize it wouldn't fit my stories perfectly! ;)

Well ya, I know where your comen from and I see why your making the comparison. It just could easily be twisted and changed to fit someone elses argument as well ;p

I just dont see it as nearly as simple :)

-=DVS=- 07-21-04 11:25 PM

Re: X800 vs 6800 = Voodoo3 vs TNT2
 
Was saying compare on bigger scale not on one generation !!

Voodoo 1 > Nvidia Riva 128
Voodoo 2 > TNT 1
Voodoo 3 < TNT 2 Ultra
Geforce 2 > Radeon 64
Geforce 3 < Radeon 8500
Geforce 4 < Radeon 9700Pro
FX 5800 < Radeon 9700Pro (5800 took very long to come out)
refreshes kinda same
6800 > X800
?? >< ??

Ruined 07-21-04 11:28 PM

Re: X800 vs 6800 = Voodoo3 vs TNT2
 
Yeh but "winning" trends aside, whats funny is ATI PR is kinda similar to 3dfx PR back in the Voodoo3 day, and the driver course of the 6800 plus the delayed showing of its capabilities is kinda similar to Nvidia back in the TNT2 day - as is general consensus sway for the two cards.

-=DVS=- 07-21-04 11:29 PM

Re: X800 vs 6800 = Voodoo3 vs TNT2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruined
Yeh but "winning" trends aside, whats funny is ATI PR is kinda similar to 3dfx PR back in the Voodoo3 day, and the driver course of the 6800 plus the delayed showing of its capabilities is kinda similar to Nvidia back in the TNT2 day - as is general consensus sway for the two cards.

Comeon don't talk about PR , people sure got short memory HELLO !! FX 5800 , that was biggest PR BS ever :ORDER:

Ruined 07-21-04 11:30 PM

Re: X800 vs 6800 = Voodoo3 vs TNT2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisRay
Well ya, I know where your comen from and I see why your making the comparison. It just could easily be twisted and changed to fit someone elses argument as well ;p

I just dont see it as nearly as simple :)

It's obvious you truly haven't digested this yet.

Obviously ATI picked up some ex-3dfx employees!

Ruined 07-21-04 11:34 PM

Re: X800 vs 6800 = Voodoo3 vs TNT2
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by -=DVS=-
Comeon don't talk about PR , people sure got short memory HELLO !! FX 5800 , that was biggest PR BS ever :ORDER:

Yeh that was PR BS but it wasn't the same as 3dfx's V3 PR BS. 3dfx actually didn't have a feature and claimed they had one that was just as effective, ATI is doing the same today. FX5800 matched the 9700 in featureset, so that analogy doesn't really work. Also, 3dfx lacked 32-bit, ATI lacks FP32. :)

-=DVS=- 07-21-04 11:54 PM

Re: X800 vs 6800 = Voodoo3 vs TNT2
 
You compareing 32 bit tnt image quality to old voodoo 3 16/22 bit, witch affected image on global level on pretty mutch every game that came out soon after, 32 bit colors not equal FP 32 precision :bleh:,there are no games to show need for it is there ? other then mistery FarCry 1.3 patch with overkill HDR :bleh:
Not like every game will suddenly use FP32 as minimum aka Unreal 3 , who will be released prolly in few years... so your point is moot :wtf: it was already said by devs SM 2 vs SM3 is speed moustly only few specific effects can't be done.... so all current games and future games till next gen will run in full glory on both cards , sure few of them will have few extra for Nvidia others will have Extra for ATI (mag)
so whats your point Ruined ??

Oh and what do you mean its not same PR its even worse , PR of Nvidia promised free AA , stelar performance , all we got after months of waiting was super hot / loud / card with subpar performance :bleh: 3DFX never made any ridiculous claims only 32bit vs 16bit withc wasn't a big deal in old days , moust people playd in 16 bit anyways on TNTs for speed :rolleyes: i recall ATIs crappy Rage 128Pro series ran 32bit pretty well.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.