nV News Forums

 
 

nV News Forums (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/index.php)
-   Benchmarking And Overclocking (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303? (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=42655)

sohcguy 12-18-04 08:06 PM

MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303?
 
A friend's computer scored a 303 in 3Dmark2003 witha MX4000, 512 megs of ram, 1.3? GHZ athlon. Is this about right?

saturnotaku 12-18-04 09:54 PM

Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303?
 
For that CPU and card, that's about right.

sohcguy 12-19-04 06:48 PM

Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303?
 
Thanks, I also , finally, found a review on the card and apparrently it won't play some of the games in 3Dmark2003 I guess because of the PSers on it. He didn't watch the benchmark as it went so I guess he didn't realize. I think the review said it was a DX7 card, yikes.

saturnotaku 12-19-04 08:48 PM

Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303?
 
The MX4000 is nothing more than a glorified GeForce2 MX.

mikedep333 12-21-04 08:33 PM

Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by saturnotaku
The MX4000 is nothing more than a glorified GeForce2 MX.

It's a continuation of the GF4 MX 440, but that beat any geforce2, even the ultra. So it was a decent budget card when it came out.

WeReWoLf 12-22-04 07:49 PM

Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303?
 
At least the MX440 could run DX8.0... The MX4000 is only DX7.0

saturnotaku 12-22-04 08:18 PM

Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WeReWoLf5900
At least the MX440 could run DX8.0... The MX4000 is only DX7.0

No, the MX440 was a DX7 part.

ragejg 12-22-04 08:30 PM

Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303?
 
MX4000's use a 64 bit memory bus, and their performance doesn't scale with cpu speeds IIRC... they find themselves beat by not only MX440SE's, but also GF2ti's/Pro's/Ultras...

WeReWoLf 12-22-04 08:58 PM

Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by saturnotaku
No, the MX440 was a DX7 part.

Really? i could've sworn that MX440 ran DX8. In HL2 the FX's ran 8.1 along with the GF4's, the GF3's ran 8.0 (and i thought that the MX440 ran 8.0 with them) and the GF 2's ran 7. i really thought that the MX440 was DX8.0

rflair 12-30-04 05:28 PM

Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303?
 
GF4's are DX8 not DX8.1 parts.

rflair
________
ipod games

T.h.o.m.a.s. 12-31-04 07:45 AM

Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WeReWoLf5900
Really? i could've sworn that MX440 ran DX8. In HL2 the FX's ran 8.1 along with the GF4's, the GF3's ran 8.0 (and i thought that the MX440 ran 8.0 with them) and the GF 2's ran 7. i really thought that the MX440 was DX8.0

it might be a dx8 compatible card ,that does not mean it supports all the functions , its has NO pixel shaders , therefore not fully dx 8 compliant

ChrisRay 12-31-04 05:26 PM

Re: MX4000 3Dmark2003 scored 303?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WeReWoLf5900
Really? i could've sworn that MX440 ran DX8. In HL2 the FX's ran 8.1 along with the GF4's, the GF3's ran 8.0 (and i thought that the MX440 ran 8.0 with them) and the GF 2's ran 7. i really thought that the MX440 was DX8.0


No the Geforce 4 MX 440 is actually a code named NV17, Which is based off the original NV10 with a new memory controller and multisampling anti aliasing. But the NV1x generation is Geforce 1 based.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.