nV News Forums

 
 

nV News Forums (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/index.php)
-   Benchmarking And Overclocking (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   Post Your Geforce Fx Benchmarks Here.. (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=9574)

DanCanovas 04-03-03 12:23 PM

Post Your Geforce Fx Benchmarks Here..
 
Lets see how high we can get!

jAkUp 04-03-03 12:59 PM

sig :)

Evildeus 04-03-03 01:53 PM

Anyone can test this (PS2.0)

http://www.inf.bme.hu/~hyp-x/sphere.zip

ricercar 04-03-03 02:32 PM

3DMark01 = 16,996
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6267873

3DMark03 = 5,949
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=542319

RobHague 04-03-03 03:42 PM

VERY nice scores there.

Mine -

3dmark01 = 12,619
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6270364

3dmark03 = 5,105
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=544323

43.45 Drivers, Set to Performance. No AA or AF. Little lower than yours but then you do have a 3000+ Barton ;) This is at standard clocks btw, including system 133/133.


Btw nice thread idea. Lets just hope it stays troll free eh ;)

RobHague 04-03-03 07:34 PM

*edit*

Click that. WTF?

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5844430

13297 3D Marks on a Gainward GF4 TI4400 @ 300 / 670

HUH!?!? springs to mind :S

jAkUp 04-03-03 08:37 PM

they overclocked the fsb... 3dmark 2k1 is extremely sensitive to overclocking memory and fsb... 3dmark 2k3 isnt so much so

walkndude 04-03-03 09:49 PM

Yes 2001 loves high fsb's -here's a 14000 on a 4200 at just 330/567 no lod tricks, application/best image quality

xp1700 on an albatron kx400+ pro(kt333) running a 207mhz fsb

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5954617

btw, just scored a 15890 running the 4200 @ 335/615 with blend and a 215mhz fsb with the 43.45 drivers but the database wont take my scores at the moment ? Will try later.
Not too shabby for a "cheapy" system(was built for GF) .

albatron mb $65
xp 1700 $47
msi 4200 $118


edit: the 15890 has the cpu at 11*215(2367mhz)

ugapug 04-04-03 12:09 AM

3dmark 03:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=551442

3dmark 01 se:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6277096

43.45 drivers, no AA, no AF, set to Application for Intellisample and Best Performance for image quality.

gokickrocks 04-04-03 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Evildeus
Anyone can test this (PS2.0)

http://www.inf.bme.hu/~hyp-x/sphere.zip

anyone want to test that out? (please state which drivers you used...and if someone has lots of spare time, to compare 43.00 w/ 43.45)

Mharwood 04-04-03 04:39 PM

Here are default benchmarks for my FX

3dmark01

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6265506

3dmark03

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=547755

43.45 drivers set to performance

I will be overclocking the machine over the weekend, but I believe the motherboard is holding me back, as the 2001 result is lower than expected

bootboy 04-05-03 03:51 AM

Finally got my a7n8x dlx at a stable overclock and pretty damn happy with the difference in 3dmarks03 that I have.
old g4 4200 @ 290/588 1552 :(
new bfg fx5800 ultra (not overclocked)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=553542
:)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2014, nV News.