View Single Post
Old 05-05-07, 10:23 PM   #7
$n][pErMan
III%
 
$n][pErMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,731
Send a message via AIM to $n][pErMan
Default Re: 3dmark06 XP vs Vista results

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shocky
It's a still a measure of DX9 performance, games can be on average 10% slower in vista so I don't think it's useless at all. It's showing DX9 performance is a fair bit slower then XP and since all games currently are DX9 that means gaming performance IS worse.
But then again... most people are switching to Vista for the expected DX10 games As said above.. if ur a benchmark fan use XP to get the highest... but if your games play fine in Vista I would not worry about it!
__________________
Intel Core i7-5930K Haswell-E 6-Core LGA 2011-v3 @ 4.7Ghz (Water Cooled) | ASRock X99 OC Formula LGA 2011-v3 (p1.40 BIOS) | 2x GeForce GTX 770 SLI 16X 4GB (Currently @ 1240MHz Core / 7112MHz Memory) | QUAD Channel G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 series 16GB (4 x 4GB) 288-Pin DDR4 2800 (14-14-14-30 @ 1T) | Sound Blaster Sound Core 3D | Samsung SSD 840 EVO Series 500GB SSD (Primary Drive) | Western Digital Black Edition 7200RPM 4TB (Archive Drive) | Windows 7 Pro x64
$n][pErMan is offline   Reply With Quote