Originally posted by Nv40
first generation of NV3x cards (not Nv35) are slower at PS2.0 than ATI but only at using 128bits.. ATi is faster
your conspiracy theories are moronic.
How is it in FUTUREMARKS best interest not to have the test be fair?
Not only that, but EVEN the nv35 is vastly slower than ATI's 9700/9800 in PS2 ops. If you disagree, offer proof pls. My proof is in any shadermark/shader test comparison.