View Single Post
Old 05-23-03, 06:49 PM   #30
Grrrpoop
Wey aye man!
 
Grrrpoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newcastle, UK
Posts: 162
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Nv40
the reason ATI perform so well and
NVidia not is because 3dmak2003 = (is the selection of ati best test in 3dmark2001)
Ps1.4/SIngle texturing/ ridiculous use of VS.. where ATi hardware
feels at home.. but at the same time lack of MUltitexturing test /and PS1.x
were ATI cards generally slower..
..so basically you're saying a benchmark designed to test gfx cards for their ability in future games should use PS1.1 and avoid using VS ..?



That reminds me, hey everyone:

Don't. Smoke. Crack.

Quote:
Originally posted by Nv40
because both companies have a diferent vision for the design of their hardware,but FUture mark
does everything so conveniently for ATI cards..
..or maybe ATI have cards that are better at processing shaders?
__________________
Don't be Care Less with your language
Grrrpoop is offline