View Single Post
Old 05-23-03, 06:49 PM   #30
Wey aye man!
Grrrpoop's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newcastle, UK
Posts: 162

Originally posted by Nv40
the reason ATI perform so well and
NVidia not is because 3dmak2003 = (is the selection of ati best test in 3dmark2001)
Ps1.4/SIngle texturing/ ridiculous use of VS.. where ATi hardware
feels at home.. but at the same time lack of MUltitexturing test /and PS1.x
were ATI cards generally slower.. basically you're saying a benchmark designed to test gfx cards for their ability in future games should use PS1.1 and avoid using VS ..?

That reminds me, hey everyone:

Don't. Smoke. Crack.

Originally posted by Nv40
because both companies have a diferent vision for the design of their hardware,but FUture mark
does everything so conveniently for ATI cards..
..or maybe ATI have cards that are better at processing shaders?
Don't be Care Less with your language
Grrrpoop is offline