View Single Post
Old 05-23-03, 07:15 PM   #16
Wey aye man!
Grrrpoop's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newcastle, UK
Posts: 162

Originally posted by OICAspork
LOL, I wish I'd seen that [H]ard thing before it was pulled... is it still up and reworded? If so, please link to it... o.o; I didn't see it myself...
No, it got reworded and is gone now, but from memory it was something like the following:

Posted by Steve 10:50 AM (CDT)
3DMark Patch:
Futuremark has released a patch for 3DMark 2003 that eliminates "artificially high scores" for people using NVIDIA Detonator FX drivers. This is in response to the news item we posted last week ( as did several sites ). This goes to show that 3Dmark is completely irrelevant as a benchmark as we stated.

Thanks to everyone who sent this one in.

Recently, there have been questions and some confusion regarding 3DMark®03 results obtained with certain NVIDIA drivers. We have now established that NVIDIA’s Detonator FX drivers contain certain detection mechanisms that cause an artificially high score when using 3DMark®03. We have just published a patch 330 for 3DMark03 that defeats the detection mechanisms in the drivers and provides correct results.
My paraphrasing is a little off, but I think I got the tone spot-on..

Kyle's frontpage character-assassination of ET was low, they deserve an apology but I doubt he 'll do the right thing.

Only guy from [H] who's commented with any credibility is Brent, he seems like a cool guy (and he has a superhero name - Brent Justice)

I'm sure that in Kyle's head he's still thinking "well if you can't see it, it's just an optimisation.."
Don't be Care Less with your language
Grrrpoop is offline   Reply With Quote