View Single Post
Old 05-24-03, 05:33 PM   #3
rellingsen
Registered User
 
rellingsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Delaware
Posts: 177
Default

Thanks for the links! After I seen the diff. in the AA quality of the 2 cards I know I won't be getting a 5900 Ultra even if it is 20-25% faster with AA on. What a blurry mess the 5900 screens are. Makes me wonder how they obtained the 20%+ lead. HH even captured the screens correctly with HyperSnap and Post Proc capture enabled. To me AA is important as I play all my game with at least 2X AA with it mostly set at 4X. I will sacrifice 10FPS not to have that blur. What a diff. when I opened them up in seperate windows and flipped back and forth between them. Look at the landing above the gun and even the tiles in the floor. Links to full pics.

5900 2XAA
http://www.hothardware.com/reviews/i...nv352xaaut.htm
9800 2XAA
http://www.hothardware.com/reviews/i...9800ut2xaa.htm

5900 4XAA
http://www.hothardware.com/reviews/i...nv354xaaut.htm
9800 4XAA
http://www.hothardware.com/reviews/i...9800ut4xaa.htm

5900 6XAA
http://www.hothardware.com/reviews/i...nv356xaaut.htm
9800 6XAA
http://www.hothardware.com/reviews/i...9800ut6xaa.htm
__________________
P4C800E-Deluxe P4 HT 3.2C@3.84 Zalman 6500-CU WinXP SP-2 DX9.0c
2X512mb HyperX PC4000 @ DDR 480
XFX 6800 Ultra running 455/1300
SB Audigy 2-Klipsch Pro-Medias 4.1
22" Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 2070SB
2-ATA 100 7200 rpm WD Drives

Last edited by rellingsen; 05-24-03 at 05:42 PM.
rellingsen is offline   Reply With Quote