View Single Post
Old 06-02-03, 08:17 PM   #82
gordon151
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 264
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by bkswaney
Well, everyone has a tail. I sit on mine.

I will stand by I think way to much was made out of the whole thing.
If compaines want to add code for Nvidia then so be it.
Same for ATI.

Also where is the real ""proof"" NV used cliping planes?
One site said they did but I find it funny no other site agreed. Such as Hardocp or anandtech.
First dibs on this statement! Yay!

Both ExtremeTech and Beyond3D acknowledged the existence of clip planes because they were the only (i.e. NO HardOCP and Anandtech) sites which had access to the developer versions of 3DMark03. Difference is Beyond3D made a quiet mention of it on their forums and notified Nvidia while ExtremeTech notified Nvidia and probably after no reply wrote a huge article about the ordeal. This was backed up by Futuremark and even in this press release they made an explicit statement regards to the type of cheat that Nvidia used, but not directly commenting onwhat Nvidia did.

Quote:
Because all modifications that change the workload in 3DMark03 are forbidden, we were obliged to update the product to eliminate the effect of optimizations identified in different drivers so that 3DMark03 continued to produce comparable results
Hrm, wonder what they are talking about there!
__________________
||- A64 2800+ @ 2.0GHz -||- 1GB Buffalo DDR400 @ 225Mhz -||- PNY 5700 128MB -||

Last edited by gordon151; 06-02-03 at 08:49 PM.
gordon151 is offline   Reply With Quote