View Single Post
Old 10-28-07, 07:47 PM   #56
Xion X2
Registered User
 
Xion X2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.
Posts: 6,701
Default Re: EA and Crytek should be sued for

Quote:
Originally Posted by sixstorm
You can't argue against benchmarks I'm afraid.
Geezus...

http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/...rmance_update/

Quote:
Originally Posted by FiringSquad
F.E.A.R. and Oblivion were easily the best case examples for both AMD and NVIDIA. Performance with both of these games was largely similar regardless of the OS tested
Quote:
Enemy Territory: Quake Wars ran similarly on all the AMD configs we tested with regardless of OS used
Quote:
Company of Heroes took a hit of 4%
Quote:
If you were holding off on Windows Vista due to the driver situation, it looks like the situation has largely been resolved for both AMD and NVIDIA.

As for Crysis, again, you are not comparing apples to apples. XP does not go to very high on the settings like Vista does due to the DX10 API. Given that, you cannot do a valid comparison unless the settings are identical between the two such as users have posted HERE, and as you can see, when options are configured the same they are nearly identical. Your claim of "35-45%" is hysterical, bogus fanaticism.

And as for the beta performance between XP/Vista? Crytek themselves stated the beta wasn't optimized at all for Vista while the final version of the game would be. Who would let their argument hinge on beta performance in the first place?
__________________

i7-2700k @ 5.0 GHz
Nvidia GeForce 570 2.5GB Tri-SLI
Asus P67 WS Revolution (Tri-SLI)
OCZ Vertex SSD x 4 (Raid 5)
G.Skill 8GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz
PC Power & Cooling 950W PSU
Xion X2 is offline   Reply With Quote