View Single Post
Old 07-09-03, 09:51 PM   #69
John Reynolds
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 365
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Nv40
well ,feel free to disagree then. its your opinion vs my opinion. vs other opinions.the UNwinder programmer ,the anti-detector programmer have accused not only One company both Two companies. of "optimizing". funny how FM have also done that too. i found very informative the 3dmark 2003 and the 3dmark2001 report with the IQ comparisons. with optimizations or without optimizations the IQ in detonators 44.61 is a good step in the right direction. whether optimizing shaders are valid or not in that benchmark is a diferent story .so probably Digitlife is right an ATI and NVidia are "optimizing" or probably not. only FutureMark can clarify that.its their benchmark and they set the rules. but taking only one side of the report (as others have done) that doesnt look good to company A and ignoring the other side of the information that doesnt look good to company B, is simply not being honest with yourself.
Well, then, so long as you accuse everyone of cheating, even when your method of induction is illogical, you're doing a good job? Great reasoning. . . .
John Reynolds is offline