View Single Post
Old 04-14-08, 10:14 AM   #92
NvFuchs
Registered Fox
 
NvFuchs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Posts: 530
Default Re: 8400M GS : Low performences

Quote:
Originally Posted by pawels133
You sounds like a troll. I'll give you some benchmarks when I'll reinstall my system.
Why would you need a new installed system to give me
links to some benchmarks?

Quote:
Only blind wouldn't see a difference, but I'll give you proofs.
Jup, I am waiting. My results are at the bottom of this thread,
just to mention it ...

Quote:
Heh, you're so funny. Compiz core is stable,
Oh, of course it is.
Buffer overflow fix: 5 days ago
Damage fix: 7 days ago, broken in official release 0.7.4

Reading the gitweb, the compiz mailing list
and the bug list shows a different image,
but maybe your definition of stable is a bit special.

Quote:
It seems that everything what you've already wrote about QT/GTK performance is just a guess. Another guess...
Well, let me check

Code:
######################
Common Information: 
######################


Hardware

Lenovo Thinkpad R61

GPU:  nVidia quadro nvs 140m 
CPU:  Intel Core2Duo T7500 
RAM:  2 GB 


Software: 

Gentoo Linux 
2.6.24-r4 (tux on ice / gentoo patches) 
xorg-x11-7.2
xorg-server 1.3.0.0 

nvidia binary driver 171.06 
(self compiled with gcc 4.1.2) 

no optimisations 

nvidia device section:

        Identifier  "Videocard0"
        Driver      "nvidia"
        VendorName  "NVIDIA"
        BoardName   "NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M"
        Option      "Coolbits"      "1"
        Option      "RenderAccel"   "true"
        Option      "UseEvents"     "false"
        Option      "TripleBuffer"  "1"
        Option      "DamageEvents"  "1"
        Option      "BackingStore"  "1"
        Option      "RandRRotation" "true
        Option      "AllowDDCCI"    "true"
        Option      "UseEdidFreqs"  "false"
        Option      "NvAGP"         "1"

InitialPixmapPlacement=1 
GlyphCache=1


######################
GTKPerf:  (100 runs) 
######################

*******************************************
Clearlooks: 

GtkPerf 0.40 - Starting testing: Mon Apr 14 17:02:20 2008

GtkEntry - time:  0.03
GtkComboBox - time:  2.01
GtkComboBoxEntry - time:  2.01
GtkSpinButton - time:  0.36
GtkProgressBar - time:  0.41
GtkToggleButton - time:  0.89
GtkCheckButton - time:  0.69
GtkRadioButton - time:  0.93
GtkTextView - Add text - time:  0.58
GtkTextView - Scroll - time:  0.58
GtkDrawingArea - Lines - time:  0.71
GtkDrawingArea - Circles - time:  0.91
GtkDrawingArea - Text - time:  0.52
GtkDrawingArea - Pixbufs - time:  0.05
 --- 
Total time: 10.69
******************************************


******************************************
GTK-Engines-QT:

GtkPerf 0.40 - Starting testing: Mon Apr 14 17:13:35 2008

GtkEntry - time:  0.02
GtkComboBox - time:  1.94
GtkComboBoxEntry - time:  1.48
GtkSpinButton - time:  0.14
GtkProgressBar - time:  0.23
GtkToggleButton - time:  0.46
GtkCheckButton - time:  0.58
GtkRadioButton - time:  0.84
GtkTextView - Add text - time:  0.57
GtkTextView - Scroll - time:  0.66
GtkDrawingArea - Lines - time:  0.62
GtkDrawingArea - Circles - time:  0.88
GtkDrawingArea - Text - time:  0.49
GtkDrawingArea - Pixbufs - time:  0.03
 --- 
Total time:  8.95

******************************************
GTK-Engines-Qt with vesa 

GtkPerf 0.40 - Starting testing: Mon Apr 14 17:36:06 2008

GtkEntry - time:  0.03
GtkComboBox - time:  1.51
GtkComboBoxEntry - time:  1.09
GtkSpinButton - time:  0.16
GtkProgressBar - time:  0.16
GtkToggleButton - time:  0.33
GtkCheckButton - time:  0.33
GtkRadioButton - time:  0.50
GtkTextView - Add text - time:  0.76
GtkTextView - Scroll - time:  0.54
GtkDrawingArea - Lines - time:  0.57
GtkDrawingArea - Circles - time:  1.09
GtkDrawingArea - Text - time:  1.00
GtkDrawingArea - Pixbufs - time:  0.02
 --- 
Total time:  8.09
GTKPerf is http://gtkperf.sourceforge.net/index.php
unfortunately the results by the author are rather old,
but interesting anyway:

http://gtkperf.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=testing

Now what?
Just as a small sidenote:

The nvs140m is a G84M, guess what,
this is a 8400G mobile ... now read the thread title.

I don't think those results are bad.
Searching the forums I found better results
(~ 4 secs), but most of them on better hardware
(this is a 128 MB + shared memory nvs140m)
and there are lots of worse results.


Quote:
Just stop trolling until I'll reinstall my system and give you some proofs.
Still waiting, in the meantime you might want to read
the definition of trolling.

Thanks in advance,

Fuchs
NvFuchs is offline   Reply With Quote