View Single Post
Old 05-31-08, 08:57 PM   #7
It's a wittle baby!
Madpistol's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 4,554
Send a message via AIM to Madpistol
Default Re: No more patches for Crysis

I didn't really run into that many gltiches with Crysis tbh. The first half of the game was well optimized and clean running, The second half though was only decent. There were quite a few unexplainable events that I ran into that impeded my progress. Reloading the level solved that, but it was still really annoying.

Far Cry on the other hand was a buggy piece of **** when it came out. It ran nearly perfectly on my Ti 4200, but as soon as I "upgraded" to an FX 5900, the graphics went to hell. It took them about 3 months after I got that card for the game to become "preferable" on the FX 5900. Of course, now the game is very well optimized, and it's a stunning game. Too bad it took them this long to get there.

MadPistol's Rig

AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (RB-C3) @ 4Ghz, 1.425 Vcore, 1.25V NB VID
Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme (w/ Scythe Gentle Typhoon 120mm fan)
Gigabyte UD3H AM3 790GX motherboard
XFX Radeon HD 5870
PNY XLR8 2x2GB CL8 DDR3 1600
G.Skill Ripjaws 2x2GB CL8 DDR3 1600
Soundblaster X-Fi Fatality Titanium
OCZ Vertex II 120GB SSD (OS drive)
Western Digital 500GB Caviar (black)
Western Digital 640GB Blue
Samsung DVD burner
Logitech MX performance mouse
Logitech G15 keyboard
Corsair HX 750-watt Modular PSU
Antec Nine Hundred case
Windows 7 Home Premium x64
ASUS MK241 24" LCD
ACER X241W 24" LCD - RIP
Madpistol is offline   Reply With Quote