Re: Sig Images. Yay or nay?
Originally Posted by |MaguS|
Well if someone wants to ask questions regarding hardware then they can post their system specs. Not like most noobs who ask the hardware questions bother posting their specs in their sig or the post anyway...
I'm not a noob, I ask alot of hardware/software questions and I would find it very inconvenient to post my specs only in related threads. If anyone finds a few simple lines of data at the bottom of my posts annoying, then it is their problem, not mine. I find the content of some posts far more annoying, but I don't complain.
EDIT: The primary reason that I find signaturebar images annoying, is because I only have a dialup connection, and they significantly slow down page loading. Most signaturebars have print so small that I can't read them anyway.
Rig 1: HAF 922, X2 4400+, Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe , 4x1GB DDR400, 2x500GB, 1x80GB & 1x250GB + ESATCASE2 w/2x1TB HDs, LG CH10LS20 & GH22LS50, Samsung SH-S202N, Asus Xonar D2X,Creative 5.1, GTX460 SC, FusionHDTV7 Gold RT, Acer X233H, Arris TM520G, Cisco E3000, Scythe Kama, CM RS600 PS,HP 5510v,APC BX1000, XP x64, W7 & Kubuntu 9.10
Rig 2: Antec SX1040BII, A8N-SLI, 2x1GB DDR400, 8800GTS, 1x500GB & 1x1TB HDs, Liteon LH-20AIL and Pioneer DVR-111, Audigy 2 ZS, Creative T20 2.1, Antec 500SP, W7 x64 & XP MCE