View Single Post
Old 07-06-08, 06:48 PM   #87
Xion X2
Registered User
 
Xion X2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: U.S.
Posts: 6,701
Default Re: HD 4870 vs GTX 260

Quote:
Originally Posted by XMAN52373 View Post
Filters. This was discussed at B3D.com. The 4850/4870 have more filters than the 260/280 does and thus take less of a hit going from 4x to 8x. It is filters that caused the R6xx line to tank when movin from 2x to 4x AA where as the G80/G92 suffered little to no hit. Nvidia left the filters alone going from G80/G92 to G200 where as ATI increased theirs a great deal going from R6xx to R7xx.
I'm not saying there aren't other factors; I'm sure that architecture plays into it. But if frame-buffer were a limitation with 4870, then you still wouldn't see such a small performance drop-off in going from 4-8xAA at high resolutions. It would take more of a hit since AA eats up VRAM.

From the very few benches I've seen, however, it looks like 2560x1600 may cause some issues. That shouldn't concern the majority of the population who don't have those monitors.
__________________

i7-2700k @ 5.0 GHz
Nvidia GeForce 570 2.5GB Tri-SLI
Asus P67 WS Revolution (Tri-SLI)
OCZ Vertex SSD x 4 (Raid 5)
G.Skill 8GB DDR3 @ 1600MHz
PC Power & Cooling 950W PSU
Xion X2 is offline