Originally Posted by Lfctony
I did not say you responded with fud, I said your response was "Its fud"... I still think that its wrong to respond with trying to discredit the info (sounding like a jackass in the process). A serious rebuttal using valid info has more weight. Instead you called it fud, but failed to provide any data of your own to counter those figures...
The problem with articles like these is no reputable source would ever publish data like this due to professional ethics.
Hardware.fr is a reputable site, but I can't give their source any weight due to their anonymity, sample size, and violation of the trust their vendors placed in them that appears to be violated. If the people they do business with can't trust them, why should I?