View Single Post
Old 06-08-09, 04:32 PM   #58
Koko56
Registered User
 
Koko56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,970
Default Re: PhysX officially sucks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregor976 View Post
Don't get me wrong. I like all the eye candy I can get. The FPS bottom line doesn't change though. Heh, a lot of us here have hellacious hardware, it's easy to forget that we're the minority.

It's a disservice and a lie to make a statement like the one I responded to earlier. PhysX has great potential, but it will never increase FPS or "response" in a game. If you have the hardware to run it without noticing the FPS drop, it looks great, but you will always see a drop in FPS. Always, no matter how it's implemented.

More eye candy always requires more hardware to maintain FPS. I don't care where the hardware is added. (CPU/GPU)
Yeah, but of you has a dedicated GPU for physics, then the FPS can stay more or less the same.

Why did I say that...
__________________
I want a rig that can play Crysis the way I can play Far Cry now.
Koko56 is offline   Reply With Quote