View Single Post
Old 03-06-10, 12:12 PM   #22
Ninja Prime
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,263
Default Re: Realitic time frame for Fermi(not happy with 5870)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enrico_be View Post
Also, 2D on HD5xxx is pathetic atm
"The GeForce GTX 285 runs as much as 11 times faster than ATI's Radeon HD 5870. Worse yet, an on-board graphics processor from a two year-old $50 motherboard bests this $400 graphics card by an order of magnitude"

But it will be fixed with Catalyst 10.4 they say

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...di,2539-9.html
http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/17966/1/
Good thing you bought a $400 3D card for 2D performance then...
Ninja Prime is offline   Reply With Quote