View Single Post
Old 03-10-10, 12:48 AM   #36
Ninja Prime
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,263
Default Re: Realistic time frame for Fermi (not happy with 5870)

Originally Posted by Iruwen View Post
You just repeated Charlie's FUD, I wouldn't call that proven.
None of that came from charlie.
Ninja Prime is offline   Reply With Quote