View Single Post
Old 03-24-10, 03:18 PM   #96
Toss3's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 4,763
Default Re: I have seen the future....

Originally Posted by SirPauly View Post
How objective really is it to compare just a single GPU doing rendering and Physics compared to a PPU doing just Physics?
This is how nvidia markets it and the reason why they don't let ATi users run nvidia cards along with their GPU. They sell it to people who think that one GPU is enough. Nowhere does it say that "to enjoy the full benefits of PhysX nvidia recommends running a second card alongside the 400$ you just purchased" on the box. A gpu+cpu setup is always going to be a better option than just one GPU doing everything.

An Ageia PPU is about as powerful as a 9600 GT to me.
Sounds about right.

EDIT: Found a chart comparing Ageia PPU with 9600GT in Mirror's Edge:

Those cpu physx numbers look horrible.

EDIT2: They also recently released their Metro2033 PhysX benchmarks:

This is the first title to properly utilize multi-core support for PhysX! Nvidia seems to be listening to the consumers!
Would have been interesting to see how a dedicated physx card would have affected the performance.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	MirrorsEdge_Ageia_PhysxScale.PNG
Views:	156
Size:	60.4 KB
ID:	39845  Click image for larger version

Name:	Metro2033-PhysX.png
Views:	145
Size:	38.4 KB
ID:	39846  
: :Asus Rampage II Gene : : Core i7 920 4011Mhz : : 6Gb 1600Mhz A-Data DDR3 : : Club3D Theatron Agrippa : : Intel 80GB SSD : : 2xSamsung F1 750Gb : : Sapphire 5850 @ 850/1225Mhz : :
: :Benq FP241W : : Optoma HD80 Projector + 92" Screen : : Genelec 8020B speakers : : Sony MDR-XB700 Headphones : : Razer Lycosa : : Razer Lachesis : :
Toss3 is offline   Reply With Quote