Originally Posted by crisalide
- Inverse telecine
I notice the IVTC deinterlacer is tested in conjunction with other deinterlacers:
MIXER TEMPORAL + IVTC (1920x1080): 42 fields/s
MIXER TEMPORAL_SPATIAL + IVTC (1920x1080): 15 fields/s
Given that inverting the telecining that is done to turn progressive content into interlaced content results in progressive/de-interlaced content, why would I combine that with another de-interlacer like TEMPORAL or TEMPORAL_SPATIAL?
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the purpose of the IVTC de-interlacer?
it would be nice to see the results from qvdpautest using just IVTC, if that's a valid configuration.
It would also be nice to see the performance of the de-interlacers at other resolutions like SD for example. That said, I'd imagine I could hack the source to do that, but then nobody else would gain the benefit whereas if you do it, it everyone gets it in the next release.
Cheers and thanx for a great tool.