View Single Post
Old 11-13-03, 01:00 PM   #20
NickSpolec
 
NickSpolec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Burning Inferno, Arizona
Posts: 371
Default

I especially love this quote from Derek Perez, in regards to the performance drop in 3DMark03 on the GFFX's (with the newest patch)

Quote:
What we expect will happen is that we'll be forced to expend more engineering effort to update our compiler's fingerprinter to be more intelligent, specifically to make it intelligent in its ability to optimize code even when application developers are trying to specifically defeat compilation and optimal code generation.
This just proves that Nvidia cares far more about benchmarks then actual games. How completely, utterly stupid do you have to be to make a comment like this? It was unintentional on Perez's part --- He was trying to make Nvidia the victum once again, ala "Oh, look what FutureMark is going to force us to do... Now we have to devote more resources to cheating because they keep disabling our cheats!"


Hey, Nvidia, hear's an idea... STOP WORRYING ABOUT 3DMARK AND WORRY MORE ABOUT GAMES.

It is just so infuriating.

Nvidia's like an addict, and the 3DMark score is their crack.
__________________
Snake's System:

[size=1][list][*]AthlonXP Mobile 2500+ (@2.5ghz, 1.850v)[*]Albatron KX18D PRO (NForce 2 Ultra @227FSB)[*]512MB's OCZ Platinum PC3200 EL (@DDR454, CAS 2.5, 6,3,3)[*]GeForce3 (@230c, 460m)[*]Fortissimo III, Gamesurround 7.1[*]POS Intel 56k Modem (soon to get high speed, though)[*]Maxtor DiamondPlus 9 120GB, ATA133 (8mb)[*]Samsung DVD/CD-RW Combo (52x32x52x16x)[*]Lite-On LTR 16102B (16x8x40x)

[/size][/list]
NickSpolec is offline   Reply With Quote