View Single Post
Old 11-20-03, 01:44 PM   #24
Registered User
ChrisRay's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 5,101

Originally posted by Rogozhin
Futuremark doesn't "optimize" for 3dmark2k3 but nvidia does -XGI is irrelevant.

How is a 3rd company optimising for 3dmark2k3 irrelevent? It further shows that the benchmark is compromisable.

Saying XGI's optimisations, and SiS, ect are irrelevent is like covering your ears and ignoring that it happens.

We'll wait and see what happens, But like I said. I'm a betting man and I'll take anyone on that bet that XGI is going to optimise for 3dmark03.
|CPU: Intel I7 Lynnfield @ 3.0 Ghz|Mobo:Asus P7P55 WS Supercomputer |Memory:8 Gigs DDR3 1333|Video:Geforce GTX 295 Quad SLI|Monitor:Samsung Syncmaster 1680x1080 3D Vision\/Olevia 27 Inch Widescreen HDTV 1920x1080

|CPU: AMD Phenom 9600 Black Edition @ 2.5 Ghz|Mobo:Asus M3n HT Deluxe Nforce 780A|Memory: 4 gigs DDR2 800| Video: Geforce GTX 280x2 SLI

SLI Forum Administrator

NVIDIA User Group Members receive free software and/or hardware from NVIDIA from time to time to facilitate the evaluation of NVIDIA products. However, the opinions expressed are solely those of the members
ChrisRay is offline   Reply With Quote