View Single Post
Old 11-20-03, 02:35 PM   #29
Registered User
ChrisRay's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 5,101

Originally posted by Rogozhin
It's not rhetoric it's logic.

The conclusion is valid-regardless of the week it's propogated in.

I only brought your initial statement to it's conclusion-I didn't begin this diatribe.

You're just playing the semantics game. I know what I said and how I said it. You can believe what I meant is open for interpretation. But it's not. My Conclusion is to stop Supporting 3dmark. The Sooner Futuremark's relevence is brought back down to "Just" a Synthetic benchmark. Rather than a Gamers benchmark where Every Magazine and PC shops sells by its numbers, Then maybe I'll be willing to change my opinion.

I suggested that we stop supporting Futuremark. So the Benchmark will be brought back down to a level of which it's not as important in the market. Has nary a thing to do with Loving Nvidias Optimisations, Or Being supportive of Nvidia.

We can continue this tripe discussion all you like Rog, But it does not change what I originally said and meant. And I close again, a Cigar is just a Cigar. And you're interpretation of what I said is completely off base.
|CPU: Intel I7 Lynnfield @ 3.0 Ghz|Mobo:Asus P7P55 WS Supercomputer |Memory:8 Gigs DDR3 1333|Video:Geforce GTX 295 Quad SLI|Monitor:Samsung Syncmaster 1680x1080 3D Vision\/Olevia 27 Inch Widescreen HDTV 1920x1080

|CPU: AMD Phenom 9600 Black Edition @ 2.5 Ghz|Mobo:Asus M3n HT Deluxe Nforce 780A|Memory: 4 gigs DDR2 800| Video: Geforce GTX 280x2 SLI

SLI Forum Administrator

NVIDIA User Group Members receive free software and/or hardware from NVIDIA from time to time to facilitate the evaluation of NVIDIA products. However, the opinions expressed are solely those of the members
ChrisRay is offline   Reply With Quote